2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11355-019-00370-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geostatistical estimation of surface soil carbon stock in Mt. Wakakusa grassland of Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the maps of OC and TN had a certain similarity to one another. As reported by Kamarudin et al (2019), the impact of the deer browsing on the vegetation was evident because vigorous growth and thus large biomass production of M. sinensis in the protection area were observed during the field survey and also visibly confirmed by Google Earth TM image, where a darker color in the protected area than in the surrounding non-protected area was visible (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Interpolation Maps Of the Examined Soil Properties At The supporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, the maps of OC and TN had a certain similarity to one another. As reported by Kamarudin et al (2019), the impact of the deer browsing on the vegetation was evident because vigorous growth and thus large biomass production of M. sinensis in the protection area were observed during the field survey and also visibly confirmed by Google Earth TM image, where a darker color in the protected area than in the surrounding non-protected area was visible (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Interpolation Maps Of the Examined Soil Properties At The supporting
confidence: 77%
“…Wakakusa grassland yielded a better estimation accuracy compared to the classical survey method, which relied on a few soil profile data with little consideration to soil variability (e.g., Matsuura et al 2012). Kamarudin et al (2019) uncovered that the classical approach, if calculated based on the soil survey data by Tamura et al (2001), resulted in 21% overestimation of the surface soil OC stock compared to the geostatistical method. On the other hand, in contrast to Av-P, the soil pH varied in the narrowest range (4.7 to 6.2) with the lowest variability (CV = 5.4%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[12] use a SW normality test with data of penetration resistance of soil in a region of Poland. [13] assess the distribution pattern of organic carbon in a region of central Japan. [13] assess distribution pattern of organic carbon in a region of central Japan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most landscape-scale assessments of SOC have focused on grasslands (Wang et al, 2009;Kamarudin et al, 2019), agricultural landscapes (Lacoste et al, 2014;Piccini et al, 2014), and sandy land (Zuo et al, 2010;Li et al, 2018). Many factors affect the spatial variability of SOC, such as hydrothermal conditions (e.g., temperature and precipitation; Post et al, 1982;Wang S. et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2019), soil properties (e.g., soil type, texture andmoisture, Homann et al, 1995;Wang et al, 2002;Zinn et al, 2005), topographic factors (e.g., elevation, slope aspect, and slope; Tsui et al, 2004;Garten et al, 2006;Seibert et al, 2007;Wiesmeier et al, 2014), and vegetation conditions (e.g., vegetation types, cover, and productivity;Wang et al, 2000;Fang et al, 2012;Yang et al, 2014;Xin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%