2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geostatistical analysis of tritium, groundwater age and other noble gas derived parameters in California

Abstract: Key characteristics of California groundwater systems related to aquifer vulnerability, sustainability, recharge locations and mechanisms, and anthropogenic impact on recharge are revealed in a spatial geostatistical analysis of a unique data set of tritium, noble gases and other isotopic analyses unprecedented in size at nearly 4000 samples. The correlation length of key groundwater residence time parameters varies between tens of kilometers ((3)H; age) to the order of a hundred kilometers ((4)Heter; (14)C; (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(116 reference statements)
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, managed aquifer recharge operations leave a distinguishable fingerprint in dissolved noble gas concentrations (Cey et al, ) with a larger excess air component. Groundwater recharge temperatures and excess air concentrations were derived from the dissolved concentrations of all atmospheric noble gases (He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe) using the unfractionated air (UA) model (Visser et al, ). Excess air is expressed as ΔNe, defined as ΔNe=()NesampleNeequilibrium0.25em0.25em1×100%, where Ne samples and Ne equilibrium are the concentrations of neon in the sample and in equilibrium with the atmosphere at the elevation and estimated recharge temperature, respectively.…”
Section: Study Area Methods Data and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, managed aquifer recharge operations leave a distinguishable fingerprint in dissolved noble gas concentrations (Cey et al, ) with a larger excess air component. Groundwater recharge temperatures and excess air concentrations were derived from the dissolved concentrations of all atmospheric noble gases (He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe) using the unfractionated air (UA) model (Visser et al, ). Excess air is expressed as ΔNe, defined as ΔNe=()NesampleNeequilibrium0.25em0.25em1×100%, where Ne samples and Ne equilibrium are the concentrations of neon in the sample and in equilibrium with the atmosphere at the elevation and estimated recharge temperature, respectively.…”
Section: Study Area Methods Data and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were collected by LLNL or United States Geological Survey (USGS) staff and analysed for dissolved noble gas concentrations at LLNL (Ekwurzel, ; Visser et al, ). Noble gas derived parameters (excess air and recharge temperature) were based on the UA model (Visser et al, ). Samples were analysed for tritium at LLNL (Clarke, Jenkins, & Top, ; Surano et al, ) and the USGS (Thatcher, Janzer, & Edwards, ) and for stable isotopes by LLNL or the USGS (Kendall & Coplen, ).…”
Section: Study Area Methods Data and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This simplest excess air model was used in order to avoid bias in derived parameters resulting from the choice of the excess air model [23,25]. Data reduction followed the methods described in [27].…”
Section: Sample Collection and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their conservative behavior in groundwater, the concentration of noble gases, especially the heavier gases whose solubilities have the strongest temperature dependency, can be used to deduce groundwater recharge temperature [28]. After measured noble gas concentrations are corrected for 'excess air' [26], recharge temperatures are typically calculated using an assumed pressure (often the atmospheric pressure at the elevation of the wellhead) and equilibrium solubility relationships [27]. However, because of the strong correlation between temperature and pressure in mountainous settings, calculated temperatures are non-unique and a range of plausible values, constrained by the physical conditions of the setting, must be considered [29][30][31].…”
Section: Sample Collection and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geostatistical analysis of groundwater age tracers from wells sampled in the CV has estimated the depth to the top of well screens pumping pre-modern (age of 60 years of more) groundwater to be between 30 -120 m (Visser et al, 2016). According…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%