Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research Bibliographic Review 2014

Weis, Ulrike; Schwager, Beate; Nohl, Uwe; Otter, Laura M.; Stoll, Brigitte; Karlowski, Patricia; Jochum, Klaus Peter

doi:10.1111/j.1751-908x.2015.00395.x

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 18 publications

(22 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Weis et al . ). A comprehensive list of reference material providers, together with their common abbreviations, is furnished in Appendix S1.…”

Section: Scientific Journals From Which Relevant Articles Were Reviewedmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Appendix S2 shows some additional references of articles published in 2014, which are not mentioned in Appendix S3 of Weis et al . (). The reference citation is preceded by a key code: the first two digits give the year of publication (here: 14 and 15); the second three digits give the serial number for the year of publication; and the last digits gives the GeoReM number (Jochum et al .…”

Section: Presentation Of Referencesmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research Bibliographic Review 2015

Weis

Schwager

Nohl

et al. 2016

Geostandard Geoanalytic Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Weis et al . ). A comprehensive list of reference material providers, together with their common abbreviations, is furnished in Appendix S1.…”

Section: Scientific Journals From Which Relevant Articles Were Reviewedmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Presentation Of Referencesmentioning

confidence: 97%

Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research Bibliographic Review 2015

Weis

Schwager

Nohl

et al. 2016

Geostandard Geoanalytic Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In this period, more than 25000 papers were published in relevant international journals, with about 2000 articles containing data for RMs (Weis et al . , , ). Analytical data, references and other metadata available for the geochemical community using the geochemical database GeoReM (http://georem.mpch-mainz.gwdg.de) were also considered.…”

Section: Reference Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

GGR Biennial Critical Review: Analytical Developments Since 2014

Linge

Bèdard

Bugoi

et al. 2017

Geostandard Geoanalytic Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This GGR biennial critical review covers developments and innovations in key analytical methods published since January 2014, relevant to the chemical, isotopic and crystallographic characterisation of geological and environmental materials. In nine selected analytical fields, publications considered to be of wide significance are summarised, background information is provided and their importance evaluated. In addition to instrumental technologies, this review also presents a summary of new developments in the preparation and characterisation of rock, microanalytical and isotopic reference materials, including a précis of recent changes and revisions to ISO guidelines for reference material characterisation and reporting. Selected reports are provided of isotope ratio analyses by both solution-nebulisation MC-ICP-MS and laser ablation-ICP-MS, as well as of radioactive isotope geochronology by LA-ICP-MS. Most of the analytical techniques elaborated continue to provide new applications for geochemical analysis, however it is noted that instrumental neutron activation analysis has become less popular in recent years, mostly due to the reduced availability of nuclear reactors to act as a neutron source. Many of the newer applications reported here provide analysis at increasingly finer resolution. Examples include atom probe tomography, a very sensitive method providing atomic scale information, nanoscale SIMS, for isotopic imaging of geological and biological samples, and micro-XRF, which has a spatial resolution many orders of magnitude smaller than conventional XRF

show abstract

“…This is in accordance with the distribution observed in the last several years (Weis et al . , ). In particular, GGR was the forum for many new reference materials, for example the Se isotopic RMs GBW 04447–GBW 04457 (Ren et al .…”

Section: Scientific Journals From Which Relevant Articles Were Reviewedmentioning

confidence: 99%