2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geospatial Mapping of International Neurosurgical Partnerships and Evaluation of Extent of Training and Engagement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to a similar study in global neurosurgery, 21 there were a greater amount of HIC‐LMIC ophthalmic partnerships, a greater amount of partnerships in Asia‐Pacific and a greater proportion of ‘T1’ partnerships. First, European‐based actors' increased presence in global ophthalmology might explain the increased number of unique partnerships.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In comparison to a similar study in global neurosurgery, 21 there were a greater amount of HIC‐LMIC ophthalmic partnerships, a greater amount of partnerships in Asia‐Pacific and a greater proportion of ‘T1’ partnerships. First, European‐based actors' increased presence in global ophthalmology might explain the increased number of unique partnerships.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Agencies experienced in global surgery can model effective partnerships and connect emerging HIC and LMIC stakeholders 18,22,23 . Improved documentation of LMIC stakeholder needs is one strategy to enhance partnership efficacy; centralising the work of global ophthalmology coordinating agencies onto online platforms such as InterSurgeon can elucidate LMIC stakeholder needs and identify potential HIC participants 21,22 . Further, a cross‐surgical platform can facilitate intra‐institutional HIC connections, yielding more robust partnerships 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations