2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geospatial application on mapping groundwater recharge zones in Makutupora basin, Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the method is not without its limitations. The main difficulty lies in defining the class limits of the factors and the weights assigned to the various factors used in the GIS (Kisiki et al, 2022, Faye et al, 2021. It should be noted that these limitations should not be seen as tangible barriers to the validity of the method.…”
Section: Groundwater Potential Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the method is not without its limitations. The main difficulty lies in defining the class limits of the factors and the weights assigned to the various factors used in the GIS (Kisiki et al, 2022, Faye et al, 2021. It should be noted that these limitations should not be seen as tangible barriers to the validity of the method.…”
Section: Groundwater Potential Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tamesgen et al [ 24 ] presented the GWP analysis with nine geo-environmental parameters through Ethiopia's RS/GIS-based Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach. Kisiki et al [ 25 ]used geospatial and RS data to define the groundwater recharge zones through the GWP evaluation. They then performed a sensitivity analysis to determine the impact of hydrologic and geological factors on their variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure2. The culture as one of sustainable goals and links all pillars to each other in sustainable[47] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%