2012
DOI: 10.1130/ges00723.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geophysical study of the San Juan Mountains batholith complex, southwestern Colorado

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these observations argue against the possibility that lamprophyres represent magmas that could have been parental to any volcanic rocks comprising the SJVF by closed system differentiation. This conclusion is supported by the fact that the lamprophyres are small volume intrusions that represent only a few 10 s of km 3 of magma; the SJVF contains 40,000+ km 3 of intermediate to felsic lavas and tuffs as well as an even larger underlying batholith (Lipman, 2007;Drenth et al, 2012).…”
Section: Closed System Processesmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…All of these observations argue against the possibility that lamprophyres represent magmas that could have been parental to any volcanic rocks comprising the SJVF by closed system differentiation. This conclusion is supported by the fact that the lamprophyres are small volume intrusions that represent only a few 10 s of km 3 of magma; the SJVF contains 40,000+ km 3 of intermediate to felsic lavas and tuffs as well as an even larger underlying batholith (Lipman, 2007;Drenth et al, 2012).…”
Section: Closed System Processesmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Geophysical constraints define a crustal batholith with an area of $10,000 km 2 underneath the San Juan Mountains (Drenth et al, 2012). Estimates from Lipman (2007) and Drenth et al (2012) constrain mafic to intermediate rock volumes (both batholith and exposed volcanics) in the San Juan Volcanic Field to $100,000-150,000 km 3 . An additional $16,000 km 3 of silicic ignimbrites are also exposed in the SJVF.…”
Section: Crustal Anatexismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite its size and importance, the existing geological studies (Gardeweg and Ramírez, 1987;Lindsay et al, 2001a, b) have several discrepancies regarding caldera limits, intra caldera ignimbrite thicknesses, collapse geometries and erupted volumes. We use gravimetry because it has been successfully used in caldera studies elsewhere to measure the subsurface caldera structure and deposit thickness -potentially resolving the discrepancies in previous interpretations (e.g., Rymer and Brown, 1986;Carle, 1988;Davy and Caldwell, 1998;Masturyono et al, 2001;Smith et al, 2006;DeNosaquo et al, 2009;Seebeck et al, 2009;Drenth et al, 2012). Based on both a gravity model and the reinterpretation of the ignimbrite stratigraphy, we suggest that the collapse geometry is significantly different than previously proposed, and that La Pacana caldera is made up of at least two nested calderas of different ages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%