1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0926-9851(98)00016-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geophysical reconnaissance of earthquake-induced liquefaction features in the New Madrid seismic zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a rough estimate, however, we performed 1D modeling of a few selected individual depth soundings. Here, we point to geophysical measurements that previously have been performed to study soil liquefaction features in the New Madrid seismic zone [19,20] and in Arkansas [21].…”
Section: Geophysical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As a rough estimate, however, we performed 1D modeling of a few selected individual depth soundings. Here, we point to geophysical measurements that previously have been performed to study soil liquefaction features in the New Madrid seismic zone [19,20] and in Arkansas [21].…”
Section: Geophysical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There are few case histories of GPR applied to the investigation of seismically-induced fractures in literature. Usually, electrical resistivity and electromagnetic induction methods (Erchul and Gularte, 1982;Wolf et al, 1998;Abu-Zeid, 2016) and geotechnical approaches (such as probabilistic and deterministic cone penetration tests, Moss et al, 2006) are preferred to delineate the earthquake-induced liquefaction. A recently new non-invasive approach to liquefaction investigation based on the applicability of active seismic and passive multichannel surface wave techniques is proposed by Castellaro et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have demonstrated the efficacy of geophysical imaging to locate paleoliquefaction features, particularly sand blows, including electrical and electromagnetic mapping (Wolf et al, 1998(Wolf et al, , 2006Tuttle et al, 1999), ground penetrating radar (Liu and Zhou, 2000;Liu and Li, 2001;Tatsuya et al, 2002;Hsu et al, 2005;Maruya et al, 2006;Al-Shukri et al, 2006), and borehole and cross-hole radar (Kayen et al, 2000(Kayen et al, , 2005. However, those studies were primarily directed towards locating such features as sand blows in the subsurface or changes in the physical properties associated with liquefaction, whereas such liquefaction artefacts were present on the surface as sand volcanoes after the Christchurch earthquakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%