1962
DOI: 10.1029/jz067i010p03955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geophysical investigation of the Puerto Rico trench and outer ridge

Abstract: Results of the seismic investigation of the Puerto Rico trench and outer ridge, carried out in 1959 by Lamont Geological Observatory, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, A. and M. College of Texas, and Hudson Laboratories, are presented as a crustal section. Three layers above the mantle having compressional velocities of 2.2, 5.3, and 6.6 km/sec are defined continuously from the Nares basin to within 20 km of the north wall of the trench. Extension of the seismic section to the north wall indicates that the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Published crustal models to explain the unusual observation of the Puerto Rico trench cover almost the entire spectrum of tectonic processes. These models included transtension and rifting at the trench [ Bunce and Fahlquist , 1962; Speed and Larue , 1991], N‐S compression and buckling [ van Gestel et al , 1998], subsidence and uplift due to geometrical complications in a strike‐slip fault system [ Jany et al , 1990], and subsidence and uplift due to counterclockwise rotation of the Puerto Rico/Virgin Island (PRVI) block [ Masson and Scanlon , 1991]. Crustal forces that operate by repeated fault ruptures will result in a slower deformation rate than mantle flow, thus it will be difficult to explain the short duration of subsidence (tens to hundreds of kiloyears) by crustal extension, block rotation, or crustal compression.…”
Section: Alternative Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published crustal models to explain the unusual observation of the Puerto Rico trench cover almost the entire spectrum of tectonic processes. These models included transtension and rifting at the trench [ Bunce and Fahlquist , 1962; Speed and Larue , 1991], N‐S compression and buckling [ van Gestel et al , 1998], subsidence and uplift due to geometrical complications in a strike‐slip fault system [ Jany et al , 1990], and subsidence and uplift due to counterclockwise rotation of the Puerto Rico/Virgin Island (PRVI) block [ Masson and Scanlon , 1991]. Crustal forces that operate by repeated fault ruptures will result in a slower deformation rate than mantle flow, thus it will be difficult to explain the short duration of subsidence (tens to hundreds of kiloyears) by crustal extension, block rotation, or crustal compression.…”
Section: Alternative Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could have existed in some form before Cenomanian time if it was a dynamic feature, the locus of underthrusting of oceanic crust beneath continental crust. Bunce and Fahlquist (1962), Talwani (1964), and Bunce (1966, p. 172) suggested that the trench is a downfaulted block, but Bunce (1966, p. 172) suggested alternately that the trench is a downwarped feature. J. reported the southward tilt of the trench-floor sediments into Puerto Rico.…”
Section: Puerto Rico Trenchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For various viewpoints on the tectonic development of the Puerto Rico Trench, the reader is referred to papers by Talwani and others (1959), Bunce and Fahlquist (1962), J. , Hersey (1962Hersey ( , 1966, Van Voorhis and Davis (1964), Donnelly (1964), Talwani (1964), Sykes and Ewing (1965), Hersey and Chase (1965), Bowin and others (1966), Bunce (1966), Bunce and Hersey (1966), and Monroe (1968).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positions of the lines were calculated by the authors on the basis of the estimated crustal thicknesses and Bouguer anomalies of Shurbet and Ewing (1956). The crust may be serpentinite, in part, but it is certainly not Bunce and Fahlquist (1962). Numbers 1 through 5 refer to sequences shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Correlation Of Geophysically Derived Crustal Crossmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Part C-D-E of Figure 5 is extended across the Puerto Rico Trench, using data from Bunce and Fahlquist (1962). Two possible positions of the base of the crust are shown in the A-B-C portion.…”
Section: Correlation Of Geophysically Derived Crustal Crossmentioning
confidence: 99%