2013
DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2013010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geophysical assessment and geotechnical investigation of quick‐clay landslides – a Swedish case study

Abstract: We present a preliminary assessment of the potential utility of various geophysical measurements carried out over a quick-clay landslide site in south-west Sweden. The multidisciplinary approach includes active P-and S-wave seismic investigations, including 2D and 3D reflection and refraction surveys, passive single and 3C seismic surveys, electrical resistivity tomography and electromagnetic surveys including controlled-source and radio-magnetotellurics, ground-penetrating radar and potential field studies. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…500 m/s) in the first few meters below the land surface. When the sediments become saturated (below water table or its vicinity) the seismic velocity makes a large increase to 1,500-1,800 m/s, which is typical for sandy or silty sediments (e.g., Malehmir et al 2013a;Salas-Romero et al 2016). During the preparation of the seismic data, a clear reflection of about 500 m/s consistently appeared at shallow depths on most shot gathers after direct arrivals (see for example the top red arrow in Fig.…”
Section: Results and Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…500 m/s) in the first few meters below the land surface. When the sediments become saturated (below water table or its vicinity) the seismic velocity makes a large increase to 1,500-1,800 m/s, which is typical for sandy or silty sediments (e.g., Malehmir et al 2013a;Salas-Romero et al 2016). During the preparation of the seismic data, a clear reflection of about 500 m/s consistently appeared at shallow depths on most shot gathers after direct arrivals (see for example the top red arrow in Fig.…”
Section: Results and Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…above water table) and another one was focused on the bedrock surface and the structures in its immediate vicinity. An approach tested before (Miller and Xia 1998;Juhlin et al 2010;Malehmir et al 2013a;Place et al 2015) was to combine two different sets of reflections, by generating a stack focusing on very shallow reflections and another one focusing on bedrock reflections or below the water table. This gave the best results for profile 1 where 10-20 m deep shallow structures could be identified.…”
Section: Refraction and Reflection Data Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques, less invasive than direct ground-based techniques (i.e., drilling, inclinometer, laboratory tests), provide information integrated on a greater volume of the soil, thus overcoming the point-scale feature of classical geotechnical measurements. Among the in situ geophysical techniques, the high-density resistivity (HDR) and groundpenetrating radar (GPR) methods have been increasingly applied for landslide investigation (McCann and Forster 1990;Malehmir et al 2013;Timothy et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a vast number of publications covering a wide range of hydrological (e.g., Rubin and Hubbard, 2005;Hördt et al, 2007;Slater, 2007), environmental (e.g., Bastani et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2013;Revil et al, 2013), and engineering applications including underground-construction studies (e.g., Danielsen and Dahlin, 2009;Malehmir et al, 2013Malehmir et al, , 2015. These mainly focus on land (or downhole) geophysical data acquisitions and interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%