2006
DOI: 10.1190/1.2184102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geophysical applications to detect sinkholes and ground subsidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, an air-filled void would generate a high-resistivity anomaly, but this would not constitute a sinkhole, strictly speaking. ERT sections acquired in a karst area outside an urbanized environment should clearly display the types of anomalies routinely encountered in sinkholes (Dobecki and Upchurch, 2006;Schwartz and Schreiber, 2009). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, an air-filled void would generate a high-resistivity anomaly, but this would not constitute a sinkhole, strictly speaking. ERT sections acquired in a karst area outside an urbanized environment should clearly display the types of anomalies routinely encountered in sinkholes (Dobecki and Upchurch, 2006;Schwartz and Schreiber, 2009). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other studies regarding sinkhole distribution have shown the clustering of sinkholes along fault lineaments (Delle Rose and Parise, 2002;Abelson et al, 2003;Doctor et al, 2008;Del Prete et al, 2010) and the decreasing number of sinkhole occurrences with increasing distance from the fault (Hyland et al, 2006;Billi et al, 2007). A lineament of sinkholes can also be used to find hidden faults (Closson and Abou Karaki, 2009).…”
Section: Releasing Bendmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 m below surface due to a relatively poor resolution, but for instance shear waves (S wave) are able to image the near-surface in high resolution (Dobecki and Upchurch, 2006;Krawczyk et al, 2012;Polom et al, 2016b;Wadas et al, 2016). Interpretation of near-surface faults and structures from the surface down to ca.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P-wave seismic refraction has been used to detect the subsurface velocity structure, as the inversion of surface waves has been used to calculate shear-wave velocities. In seismic refraction strong lateral variations of the velocities and zones with decreased seismic velocities are shown to be associated with salt dissolution (e.g., Karaman and Karadayilar, 2004;Dobecki and Upchurch, 2006). With a resolution of 15 to 20 % of the investigated depth (Briaud, 2013), this technique has a lower resolution with respect to the shear-wave reflection method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%