2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomorphometric variability of “monogenetic” volcanic cones: Evidence from Mauna Kea, Lanzarote and experimental cones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
55
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Riedel at al. (2003) and Kervyn et al (2012), CV can be expressed as CV = 11.31H co , H co being the cone's height. The link between W co and H co has long been taken as H co /W co = 0.18 (Porter, 1972;Wood, 1980).…”
Section: Cinder Cones and Magma Volumesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Riedel at al. (2003) and Kervyn et al (2012), CV can be expressed as CV = 11.31H co , H co being the cone's height. The link between W co and H co has long been taken as H co /W co = 0.18 (Porter, 1972;Wood, 1980).…”
Section: Cinder Cones and Magma Volumesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown that morphometric variability can be influenced by factors such as pre-eruptive surface inclination, vent migration and lava outflow with associated crater breaching and the diversity of pyroclastic rocks accumulated in the flanks of these volcanic edifices (Kereszturi et al, 2012) or by the intrinsic cone material properties, time-dependent eruption conditions and the method used to estimate the cone height (Kervyn et al, 2012). Extremely juvenile scoria cones that barely exceed few thousand years in age, such as the small-volume scoria cones from Tenerife, Canary Islands, are featured with slope angles for flank sectors that differ by as much as 12° (Kereszturi et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present investigation for the scoria cone morphometry was carried out both for Harrat Rahat and HKHB by adopting the morphometric parameter-based method given by Favalli et al (2009) and Kervyn et al (2012). Certain constraints were experienced for morphometric analysis in the present study due to the resolution issue associated with the ASTER GDEM -version 2 data having a maximum 30 m resolution and vertical accuracy of 8.68 meters (Taachikawa et al, 2011) and Google Earth images; as a result, all scoria cones even with very well preserved crater could not be adequately identified.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past decade an increasing number of scientific works have addressed research questions about scoria cone degradation. Various approaches have been suggested to define and measure volcanic cone dimensions [10,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. These methods advocate measuring cone morphometric parameters to generate discrimination diagrams, as well as using volcanic slope angles as a key physical parameter to indicate typical erosion paths and relative erosional trends over time for scoria cones (on a scale of up to millions of years).…”
Section: Proposed Geositementioning
confidence: 99%