2021
DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomorphometric analysis of the natural and anthropogenic seascape of Naples (Italy): A high‐resolution morpho‐bathymetric survey

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri butio n-NonCo mmerc ial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most commonly, elevation data and morphological features are visualized with the hillshading method in which the lightness or darkness of a surface is determined by the incidence angle between the illumination direction and the surface, resulting in an intuitive representation of the morphology of the Earth's surface (Kokalj et al, 2011;Zaksěk et al, 2011). Some recent publications displaying hillshaded bathymetric data include: Madricardo et al, 2019;Caporizzo et al, 2021;Fabbri et al, 2021;Wu et al, 2021;Aiello and Sacchi, 2022;Li et al, 2022;Piret et al, 2022;Post et al, 2022;Riddick et al, 2022;Sandwell et al, 2022;Streuff et al, 2022;Zheng et al, 2022. Despite the widespread use of the Hillshade, analytical hillshading has inherent limitations due to the directional bias induced by a single light source (Onorati et al, 1992;Smith and Clark, 2005;Zaksěk et al, 2011;. The two most common problems with hillshading are 1) that morphological features which are parallel to the light source are barely visible (sometimes even invisible), and 2) that directly lit/shaded features are too light/dark to exhibit subtle relief (Zaksěk et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most commonly, elevation data and morphological features are visualized with the hillshading method in which the lightness or darkness of a surface is determined by the incidence angle between the illumination direction and the surface, resulting in an intuitive representation of the morphology of the Earth's surface (Kokalj et al, 2011;Zaksěk et al, 2011). Some recent publications displaying hillshaded bathymetric data include: Madricardo et al, 2019;Caporizzo et al, 2021;Fabbri et al, 2021;Wu et al, 2021;Aiello and Sacchi, 2022;Li et al, 2022;Piret et al, 2022;Post et al, 2022;Riddick et al, 2022;Sandwell et al, 2022;Streuff et al, 2022;Zheng et al, 2022. Despite the widespread use of the Hillshade, analytical hillshading has inherent limitations due to the directional bias induced by a single light source (Onorati et al, 1992;Smith and Clark, 2005;Zaksěk et al, 2011;. The two most common problems with hillshading are 1) that morphological features which are parallel to the light source are barely visible (sometimes even invisible), and 2) that directly lit/shaded features are too light/dark to exhibit subtle relief (Zaksěk et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%