2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomorphology as a first order control on the connectivity of riparian ecohydrology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the Australian experience with wildfire-affected eucalypts, Nolan et al (2014) found that leaves resprouted along the trunk and branches, resulting in lower hydraulic resistance and hence higher transpiration per unit leaf area by nearly a factor of two. Therefore, despite the widespread practice of taking vegetation index as an index of transpiration (Nagler et al 2005, Wine and Hendrickx 2013, Cadol and Wine 2017, this approach is a simplification in areas in which the vegetation index-transpiration relationship changes following wildfire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the Australian experience with wildfire-affected eucalypts, Nolan et al (2014) found that leaves resprouted along the trunk and branches, resulting in lower hydraulic resistance and hence higher transpiration per unit leaf area by nearly a factor of two. Therefore, despite the widespread practice of taking vegetation index as an index of transpiration (Nagler et al 2005, Wine and Hendrickx 2013, Cadol and Wine 2017, this approach is a simplification in areas in which the vegetation index-transpiration relationship changes following wildfire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), this practice could bias predictions toward wetlands that are more connected to surface hydrology (or simply the flow lines in the dataset being used). This may diminish the response of groundwater‐fed riparian areas (Cadol and Wine ) and isolated wetlands that would have otherwise been identified by the model. Therefore, we recommend developing initial models using only carefully selected spectral and terrain variables, assessing the results, and then adding ancillary variables as necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field-based methods Assessed changes in water and sediment connectivity within a watershed based on observed changes in channel geometry and bed grain size Vanacker et al, 2005 Assessed limits to sediment connectivity based on the presence of landforms or depositional features that indicate sediment storage or constraints on sediment removal Fryirs et al, 2007 Used electrical resistance sensors to quantify streamflow continuity through time and space Jaeger and Olden, 2012 Used hydrologic modeling and indirect flood stage indicators in the field to map the flood inundation width as a measure of channelfloodplain connectivity during an extreme flood Croke et al, 2013 Distribution of bedrock knickpoints (and associated channel and valley characteristics) as a feature that disconnects hillslopechannel processes May et al, 2017 Longitudinal changes in channel geometry, sediment storage, and grain size distribution as indicators of tributary-induced longitudinal sediment disconnectivity along river channels Rice, 2017 Remotely based methods Measured connectivity index defined in Table 2 using ArcGIS software with 2.5 m digital terrain model developed from lidar data Cavalli et al, 2013 Used graph theory to illustrate sediment connectivity; a graph is a data structure consisting of a set of nodes connected by edges; nodes can represent locations in space, groups of objects, or the properties of objects and edges can represent any causal, statistical, inferential, or spatial relationship or a process; edges can be undirected or directed Heckmann and Schwanghart, 2013;Heckmann et al, 2015 Used topographic and vegetation cover data to calculate a mean flow path length as a measure of hydrological connectivity on hillslopes Puttock et al, 2013 Assessed connectivity within a river network by conceptualizing a network as composed of links (river reaches) and nodes (confluences or dams) and measured the distance between nodes Grill et al, 2014 Using digital elevation models (DEMs) or digital terrain models (DTMs) with differencing in ArcGIS to calculate changes in elevation/topography/sediment volume through time e.g., Micheletti et al, 2015;Wester et al, 2014 Calculated sand transport using dendritic connectivity index and compared to channel migration rates as calculated from aerial photographs Czuba and Foufoula-Georgiou, 2015 Assessed spatial differences in vertical hydrologic connectivity based on multi-year correlations among precipitation, streamflow, and riparian vegetation Cadol and Wine, 2017 Numerical simulations of water and sediment routing through networks Coulthard and Van De Wiel, 2017; Gran and Czuba, 2017 to achieve (Blue and Brierley, 2016), how a particular area targeted...…”
Section: Methods Referencementioning
confidence: 99%