2003
DOI: 10.1002/esp.545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomorphological and historical data in assessing landslide hazard

Abstract: Traditionally, earth scientists assess landslide occurrence on the basis of geomorphological investigations carried out through aerial photograph interpretation and fieldwork. Conversely, local administrators primarily evaluate the impact of natural catastrophes, such as landsliding, on the basis of historical records and data. Owing to the substantial difference in the structure and spatial density of these two types of information, it is difficult to compare them directly and few investigators have attempted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
100
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
100
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Predictions based solely on the geographical location of future landslides (susceptibility) are very common due to the fact that they are relatively easy to carry out. A variety of statistical techniques are available for such analysis, including those based on logistic regression analysis (e.g., Atkinson and Massari, 1998;Ohlmacher and Davis, 2003;Suzen and Doyuran, 2004;Nefeslioglu et al, 2008), discriminant analysis (e.g., Baeza and Corominas, 2001;Carrara et al, 2003;Guzzetti et al, 2005), conditional analysis (e.g., Clerici et al, 2002), and weight of evidence (e.g., van Westen et al, 2003;Neuhaeuser and Terhorst, 2007). The obtained susceptibility maps generally do not provide information on the extent of landslides (accumulation area), the number of landslides, the size of landslides (small or a very large landslide), or the temporal frequency of slope failures.…”
Section: Susceptibility and Hazard Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictions based solely on the geographical location of future landslides (susceptibility) are very common due to the fact that they are relatively easy to carry out. A variety of statistical techniques are available for such analysis, including those based on logistic regression analysis (e.g., Atkinson and Massari, 1998;Ohlmacher and Davis, 2003;Suzen and Doyuran, 2004;Nefeslioglu et al, 2008), discriminant analysis (e.g., Baeza and Corominas, 2001;Carrara et al, 2003;Guzzetti et al, 2005), conditional analysis (e.g., Clerici et al, 2002), and weight of evidence (e.g., van Westen et al, 2003;Neuhaeuser and Terhorst, 2007). The obtained susceptibility maps generally do not provide information on the extent of landslides (accumulation area), the number of landslides, the size of landslides (small or a very large landslide), or the temporal frequency of slope failures.…”
Section: Susceptibility and Hazard Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no general agreement has yet been reached about the best method for producing landslide hazard assessment maps (Guzzetti et al, 2000). Although all known methods have their advantages and disadvantages, utilization of quantitative methods has become preferred and more commonly used in recent years (Binaghi et al, 1998;Aleotti and Chowdhury, 1999;Guzzetti et al, 2000;Carrara et al, 2003;Ercanoglu, 2003;. In addition, utility of GIS (Geographical Information Systems) has been emphasized in nearly every landslide study published in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discriminant function model is used to determine the relationship between the outcome or the dependent variable (e.g. slope failure) and the independent or predictor variables (causal factors of slope failure) (Nagarajan et al 2000;Carrara et al 2003;Ghosh et al 2012;Jagielko et al 2012). This model is required when there are multiple (i.e.…”
Section: Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%