2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomorphological analysis and classification of foredune ridges based on Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have also suggested scaling issues that occur when linking microscale transport processes to mesoscale dune evolution (Sherman, ; Davidson‐Arnott and Law, 1996; Arens, ; Fabbri et al ., ). For example, high winds often accompany high waves and water levels and increased precipitation, which reduce fetch and increase the surface moisture on the beach, reducing transport – processes that are unaccounted for in these simplified transport models (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Others have also suggested scaling issues that occur when linking microscale transport processes to mesoscale dune evolution (Sherman, ; Davidson‐Arnott and Law, 1996; Arens, ; Fabbri et al ., ). For example, high winds often accompany high waves and water levels and increased precipitation, which reduce fetch and increase the surface moisture on the beach, reducing transport – processes that are unaccounted for in these simplified transport models (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Multiple researchers have identified that temporal variability in foredune volume change has a stronger link to storm erosional processes (i.e. waves) than to aeolian transport potential (Keijsers et al ., ; Fabbri et al ., ). The use of the von Karman constant (0.4) in the derivation of shear velocity, as opposed to the apparent von Karman parameter that is transport‐rate dependent, may also lead to increases in the magnitude of Q (Sherman et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Significant wave height (H 1/3 ) is the mean wave height of the largest one third of the waves, recorded hourly. Relative storm intensity (SI) was calculated as follows: bold-italicSIbold-italic=bold-italicibold-italic=bold1nbold-italicH1/3i20.25em where n is the duration in hours (> = 6) during which the significant wave height of the event exceeds twice the yearly average significant wave height (Fabbri et al, ; Mendoza & Jiménez, ). For the study region, the yearly average significant wave height is 2.17 m. Relative water level information was interpreted from the time‐lapse imagery and used due to the lack of nearby tide gauge information at this remote site.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where n is the duration in hours (> = 6) during which the significant wave height of the event exceeds twice the yearly average significant wave height (Fabbri et al, 2017;Mendoza & Jiménez, 2005). For the study region, the yearly average significant wave height is 2.17 m. Relative water level information was interpreted from the time-lapse imagery and used due to the lack of nearby tide gauge information at this remote site.…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Earth Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%