2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomorphic evolution of the Malta Escarpment and implications for the Messinian evaporative drawdown in the eastern Mediterranean Sea

Abstract: Carbonate escarpments are submarine limestone and dolomite cliffs that have been documented in numerous sites around the world. Their geomorphic evolution is poorly understood due to difficulties in assessing escarpment outcrops and the limited resolution achieved by geophysical techniques across their steep topographies. The geomorphic evolution of carbonate escarpments in the Mediterranean Sea has been influenced by the Messinian salinity crisis (MSC). During the MSC (5.97-5.33 Ma), the Mediterranean Sea bec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(136 reference statements)
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This argues against the possibility of multiple flooding events (Rouchy and Martin, 1992) or against calm periods intercalated during the flood. It conflicts with the interpretation of a ravinement surface in the Gulf of Lions as the result of wave erosion during the flood (Bache et al, 2009;Estrada et al, 2011) and suggests that this might have been formed during climatically-controlled changes of lake level during the drawdown phase, similar to the wave-cut surfaces in the Malta Escarpment that will be shown below (Micallef et al, 2019). The accelerating flooding rates due to inlet erosion (Garcia-Castellanos et al, 2009) precludes the stagnation of the flooding process once the water discharge has become substantial in comparison with the water budget of the Mediterranean and has significantly risen its level.…”
Section: First Models and Quantifications Of The Zanclean Floodmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This argues against the possibility of multiple flooding events (Rouchy and Martin, 1992) or against calm periods intercalated during the flood. It conflicts with the interpretation of a ravinement surface in the Gulf of Lions as the result of wave erosion during the flood (Bache et al, 2009;Estrada et al, 2011) and suggests that this might have been formed during climatically-controlled changes of lake level during the drawdown phase, similar to the wave-cut surfaces in the Malta Escarpment that will be shown below (Micallef et al, 2019). The accelerating flooding rates due to inlet erosion (Garcia-Castellanos et al, 2009) precludes the stagnation of the flooding process once the water discharge has become substantial in comparison with the water budget of the Mediterranean and has significantly risen its level.…”
Section: First Models and Quantifications Of The Zanclean Floodmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The head of this canyon has an amphitheater-shaped head, 6 km in width and 700 m high. This is very unusual for a submarine canyon and conspicuously different from the other canyons along the escarpment (Micallef et al, 2019). The strike of the Noto Canyon changes by 90°at a distance of 8 km upslope from its mouth.…”
Section: Amphitheater-headed Canyon In the Malta Escarpmentmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Accordingly, the pre-MES unit has been interpreted as a Cenozoic sediment package that includes mainly limestone and marls, locally pierced by volcanic and/or mud intrusions forming sometimes cone-shaped seamounts at the seafloor ( Figure 3A) (see also Scandone et al, 1981;Catalano et al, 2001;Barreca, 2014). According to its seismic characters (high reflectivity of the top reflector) and to the abundant literature concerning similar deposits occurring all around the Mediterranean basin (Lofi et al, 2011;Micallef et al, 2019 and references therein), the MES unit has been interpreted as Messinian in age deposits (mainly gypsum and evaporitic carbonate). The overlying Unit PQ 1 is interpreted as a part of the Pliocene succession since it correlates with the subunits "PQb" and "PQc" described by Camerlenghi et al (2019) and partly with the "Unit one" of Micallef et al (2018).…”
Section: Seismic Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%