2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomorphic effectiveness of check dams in a debris-flow catchment using multi-temporal topographic surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS) and Structure from Motion (SfM) topographic surveys carried out in selected sectors of the basin, have permitted evaluating the erosion and depositions related to debris flows (Cucchiaro et al, 2018) and the effect of check dams on sediment dynamics (Cucchiaro et al, 2019a). The lack of this information for the whole basin and the entire monitoring period, however, hampers the understanding of the variations in frequency and magnitude of the debris flows in the Moscardo Torrent basin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS) and Structure from Motion (SfM) topographic surveys carried out in selected sectors of the basin, have permitted evaluating the erosion and depositions related to debris flows (Cucchiaro et al, 2018) and the effect of check dams on sediment dynamics (Cucchiaro et al, 2019a). The lack of this information for the whole basin and the entire monitoring period, however, hampers the understanding of the variations in frequency and magnitude of the debris flows in the Moscardo Torrent basin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing studies assume that the influencing factors for susceptibility are constant over time [15,54]. However, the DEM data always change significantly over time owing to landscape reshaping, such as landslides and engineering construction [30,31,55]. A susceptibility assessment is, therefore, closely related to the data source [56], and as such the susceptibility maps of the study area are not consistent.…”
Section: Advantages and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of landscape changes and reshaping processes (e.g., earthquakes and engineering construction), the DEM data usually show obvious temporal variation. An example of significant temporal variation of DEM data was shown by Cucchiaro et al, who substantiated that the DEM difference of the eastern Italian Alps within one month is up to 0.14 m [30]. Pineux et al demonstrated that the changes experienced by a DEM over time are obvious and unpredictable [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…) and the impact of channel control works on such an active catchment (Cucchiaro et al. ). Such a test site offers the opportunity to evaluate the accuracy of several interpolation techniques with a special focus on morphometry‐related analyses.…”
Section: Test Areamentioning
confidence: 99%