1989
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1989.01860320064020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometry of the Vascular Pedicle in Free Tissue Transfers to the Head and Neck

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These flaps provide consistent, vascular pedicles with adequate length and diameter. 3,4,6,7,19 As soft-tissue defects are usually superficial, the direction and pedicle of these flaps can more easily be changed during inset so as to reach the vessels more easily (see Fig. 4).…”
Section: Recipient Vessels For Soft Tissue Flapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These flaps provide consistent, vascular pedicles with adequate length and diameter. 3,4,6,7,19 As soft-tissue defects are usually superficial, the direction and pedicle of these flaps can more easily be changed during inset so as to reach the vessels more easily (see Fig. 4).…”
Section: Recipient Vessels For Soft Tissue Flapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,8,20,[30][31][32] However, the external jugular vein is preferred as the recipient vein in other reports. 6,33 There are some controversies about the selection of recipient veins after neck dissection. In radical or modified radical neck dissections in which the internal jugular vein is sacrificed, the external jugular vein may be the only readily available recipient vessel on the dissected side.…”
Section: Recipient Veinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14,15 The artery which is flipped up for anastomosis sometimes kinks at its root because the natural lie of the artery is caudal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation can occur rapidly at the site of anastomosis or its development may be delayed resulting in secondary ischemia. Patient selection, vessel selection, and attention to vessel geometry are not totally sufficient to avoid flap failure [13]. There must be a very meticulous microvascular technique to minimize damage to the vascular endothelium [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%