2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2006.16959
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometry of log-concave functions: the $L_p$ Asplund sum and the $L_{p}$ Minkowski problem

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to develop a basic framework of the L p theory for the geometry of log-concave functions, which can be viewed as a functional "lifting" of the L p Brunn-Minkowski theory for convex bodies. To fulfill this goal, by combining the L p Asplund sum of log-concave functions for all p > 1 and the total mass, we obtain a Prékopa-Leindler type inequality and propose a definition for the first variation of the total mass in the L p setting. Based on these, we further establish an L p Minkowski t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Please see definitions for W s p,j , u H and ψ H in Subsection 5.3 for detailed information.) When j = 0 and s = 0, it recovers the integral interpretation of variation formulas in [28] and [54], for p ≥ 1 and 0 < p < 1, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(Please see definitions for W s p,j , u H and ψ H in Subsection 5.3 for detailed information.) When j = 0 and s = 0, it recovers the integral interpretation of variation formulas in [28] and [54], for p ≥ 1 and 0 < p < 1, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…We verify that these L p,s convolutions satisfy elegant properties by L p coefficients (C p,λ,t , D p,λ,t ). In Subsection 2.2, we introduce the L p,s Asplund summation through the base functions for s-concave functions inspired by the case of log-concave functions [28,53,54] for p ≥ 1 and 0 < p < 1, respectively. Furthermore in Subsection 2.3, we compare definitions proposed in Subsections 2.1 and 2.2, and prove that for log-concave functions (s = 0), these two summations for p ≥ 1 are equivalent to each other.…”
Section: Functional L P Operations For P >mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations