2020 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Information Communication and Signal Processing (ICICSP) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icicsp50920.2020.9232056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometry-based Completed Local Binary Pattern for Texture Image Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, research on the authenticity identification of anti-counterfeiting code mainly focuses on traditional image processing and machine learning algorithms. To evaluate the classification performance of the FG-DPANet network, the 13 most common and advanced existing methods, CLBC [49], CLBP [50], COV-LBPD [51], ECLBP [22], LBP [52], LDEP [53], LGONBP [23], MCDR [54], MRELBP [55], RALBGC [56], RAMBP [24], MMLR [57] and GCLBP [58] are chosen for comparison to the FG-DPANet network. To comprehensively evaluate the performance of the digital image anti-counterfeiting algorithm, we test the classification accuracy, recall and F1 value of each digital image anti-counterfeiting algorithm.…”
Section: Compared To the Textural Anti-counterfeiting Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, research on the authenticity identification of anti-counterfeiting code mainly focuses on traditional image processing and machine learning algorithms. To evaluate the classification performance of the FG-DPANet network, the 13 most common and advanced existing methods, CLBC [49], CLBP [50], COV-LBPD [51], ECLBP [22], LBP [52], LDEP [53], LGONBP [23], MCDR [54], MRELBP [55], RALBGC [56], RAMBP [24], MMLR [57] and GCLBP [58] are chosen for comparison to the FG-DPANet network. To comprehensively evaluate the performance of the digital image anti-counterfeiting algorithm, we test the classification accuracy, recall and F1 value of each digital image anti-counterfeiting algorithm.…”
Section: Compared To the Textural Anti-counterfeiting Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its classification accuracy and computer simplicity, LBP Texture Operator has been a significant approach in numerous applications. e methodology to the usually diverse quantitative and organizational model of image segmentation might be considered as a unifying one [30]. Maybe the most essential quality in real-world applications of the LBP operator is its stability against monotonous grey-scale shifts produced by lighting difference are calculated by neighboring pixels in the x-direction; then, both the y address sum and difference are reproduced in the y-direction [31].…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%