2002
DOI: 10.1080/09853111.2002.10510761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometry and origin of folding in the Neogene sediments of the Gediz Graben, western Anatolia, Turkey

Abstract: A close relationship between formation of approximately upright folds with axes normal to the extension direction and ramp/flat extensional geometries is established for well exposed Neogene syn-extensional rocks on the presently low-angle Gediz detachment fault. along the southern margin of the Gediz Graben region of western Anatolia, Turkey. Three unconformity-bounded sedimentary sequences and several metamorphic extensional allochthons were mapped in the upper-plate of the Gediz detachment. The oldest sedim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Published work in the Aegean demonstrates the close spatial and temporal relationship among development of extensional detachment faults, ductile shear zones and granite emplacement (Verge, 1993; Bozkurt & Park, 1994; Hetzel et al . 1995 a , b ; Avigad, Baer & Heimann, 1998; Forster & Lister, 1999; Koçyiğit, Yusufoğlu & Bozkurt, 1999; Okay & Satır, 2000; Işık & Tekeli, 2001; Sözbilir, 2001, 2002; Pe-Piper, Piper & Matarangas, 2002; Bozkurt & Sözbilir, 2004; Işık, Tekeli & Seyitoğlu, 2004; Ring & Collins, 2005; Thomson & Ring, 2006).
Figure 1.Tectonic map of the Aegean region showing tectonic units, major tectonic structures, metamorphic massifs, syntectonic granitoids and Neogene extension directions (structural data are from Lee & Lister, 1992; Hetzel et al .
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published work in the Aegean demonstrates the close spatial and temporal relationship among development of extensional detachment faults, ductile shear zones and granite emplacement (Verge, 1993; Bozkurt & Park, 1994; Hetzel et al . 1995 a , b ; Avigad, Baer & Heimann, 1998; Forster & Lister, 1999; Koçyiğit, Yusufoğlu & Bozkurt, 1999; Okay & Satır, 2000; Işık & Tekeli, 2001; Sözbilir, 2001, 2002; Pe-Piper, Piper & Matarangas, 2002; Bozkurt & Sözbilir, 2004; Işık, Tekeli & Seyitoğlu, 2004; Ring & Collins, 2005; Thomson & Ring, 2006).
Figure 1.Tectonic map of the Aegean region showing tectonic units, major tectonic structures, metamorphic massifs, syntectonic granitoids and Neogene extension directions (structural data are from Lee & Lister, 1992; Hetzel et al .
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study area is located in the Alpine-Himalayan orogenic belt, and is a part of tectonically active zone with numerous fault lines (Sozbilir 2002). The major tectonic lines observed in the study area are the E−w directed graben faults with lengths ranging up to 100 km, which are cut by N−S directed secondary faults (Inci 1991;Suzen et al 2006).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2000) concluded that this formation was deposited within the NE- and NW-trending cross grabens, which developed as a result of N–S compression prior to development of the present E-trending Aegean graben system (Yılmaz et al . 2000), while some others such as Sözbilir (2002), Bozkurt & Sözbilir (2004), Purvis & Robertson (2004) and Çiftçi & Bozkurt (2009) advocated that the Soma Formation was deposited in a lake environment developed during the early stage of the E–W rifting in Western Anatolia. Based on pollen (Yalçınkaya & Afşar, 1980), ostracods (Akyürek & Soysal, 1983), mammal fossils (Bernor & Tobien, 1990) and mollusc fauna (Yeşilyurt & Taner, 1999), a Middle to Late Miocene age was assigned for the deposition of the Soma Formation.…”
Section: Geological Settings and Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%