2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometry- and Appearance-Based Reasoning of Construction Progress Monitoring

Abstract: Although adherence to project schedules and budgets is most highly valued by project owners, more than 53% of typical construction projects are behind schedule and more than 66% suffer from cost overruns, partly due to inability to accurately capture construction progress. To address these challenges, this paper presents new geometry-and appearance-based reasoning methods for detecting construction progress, which has the potential to provide more frequent progress measures using visual data that are already b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of computational algorithms have been also reported to provide better solutions on these limitations [e.g. 13,14,16,18].…”
Section: Colour Image For Materials Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A number of computational algorithms have been also reported to provide better solutions on these limitations [e.g. 13,14,16,18].…”
Section: Colour Image For Materials Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Dimitrov et al [14] presented a new algorithm based on Structure-from-Motion (SfM) combined with image statistical analysis. Hang et al [16] proposed a manual integration of 3D point cloud and 2D image patches to facilitate 4D BIM with the site photolog and SfM accompanied with specially designed image database.…”
Section: Colour Image For Materials Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To solve these problems, researchers used 3D imaging technologies along with BIM models to generate as-built 3D models and detect discrepancies (Asadi et al 2019b;Bosché et al 2015;Han et al 2018;. Comparing as-built 3D models with BIM elements can help the engineers and technicians to detect the discrepancies easily (Boroujeni and Han 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Tezel and Aziz (2017), the use of these technologies can contribute to the reduction of non-value adding, error-prone, and time-consuming activities associated with the construction progress monitoring process. Such benefits are related to the optimization of managerial tasks, the decrease of the number of mistakes made in routine tasks associated with the progress monitoring process, and the possibility of integrated visual management between schedule planning and production performance control, making the construction progress monitoring more efficient, transparent and collaborative (Tezel and Aziz 2017;Han et al 2018;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%