2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(99)00294-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometrically-exact sandwich shells: The static case

Abstract: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 189 (2000) 167-203. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00294-7Received by publisher: 1998-06-25Harvest Date: 2016-01-04 12:20:58DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00294-7Page Range: 167-20

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The kinematic description of the present element consists of only displacement dofs at the top and bottom surfaces of the shell. Complex finite rotation updates such as those found in stress-resultant shell elements [9] is avoided. The present formulation also provides a natural way to connect to regular solid elements (see Figure 1) without the need for transition elements or submodelling technique as in Reference [8], in which the modelling processes are laborious and error prone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The kinematic description of the present element consists of only displacement dofs at the top and bottom surfaces of the shell. Complex finite rotation updates such as those found in stress-resultant shell elements [9] is avoided. The present formulation also provides a natural way to connect to regular solid elements (see Figure 1) without the need for transition elements or submodelling technique as in Reference [8], in which the modelling processes are laborious and error prone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the same performance in bending as with stress-resultant shell formulations with plane-stress assumption (e.g. Reference [9]), the enhanced assumed strain (EAS) method and the assumed natural strain (ANS) method are employed in the present solid-shell formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the relevant literature, [Simo and Fox 1989;VuQuoc et al 2000], membranal, curvature and shear strains for the shell have been defined as:…”
Section: Shear Deformable and Polar Shell Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the discretization through the thickness direction should be similar with the mesh density in the in-plane direction due to the limitation of the element aspect ratio, resulting in much higher computational cost since the overall model composed of great many solid elements comprises million degrees of freedom. In contrast, the shell elements are computationally efficient [9][10][11], but most of shell elements are not able to accurately capture the interlaminar transverse shear stress and the transverse normal stress through the plate thickness direction, because these shell elements employ the common kinematic assumptions of inextensibility in the thickness direction or the zero transverse normal-stress condition etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%