2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2013.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometrically exact beam finite element formulated on the special Euclidean group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
168
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(62 reference statements)
4
168
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relevance of SE(3) and the associated algebra se(3) to rod theory is acknowledged by Sander [18], discussed in a review by Chirikjian [19], and exploited in beam modeling by Sonneville, Cardona and Brüls [20,21]. These authors base their approaches on representing a rod through elements of the group SE(3), but we propose that the algebra se(3) provides a representation that is more naturally and directly related to the shape of a rod.…”
Section: The Lie Algebra and The Lie Group Associated With The Rod Dementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relevance of SE(3) and the associated algebra se(3) to rod theory is acknowledged by Sander [18], discussed in a review by Chirikjian [19], and exploited in beam modeling by Sonneville, Cardona and Brüls [20,21]. These authors base their approaches on representing a rod through elements of the group SE(3), but we propose that the algebra se(3) provides a representation that is more naturally and directly related to the shape of a rod.…”
Section: The Lie Algebra and The Lie Group Associated With The Rod Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, we introduce a discretization of the shape of a rod viewed as a path in the algebra se(3), as defined by L. This generalizes to special Cosserat rods the approach used by Bertails, Audoly, Cani, Querleux, Leroy and Lévêque [11] for Kirchhoff rods and can be viewed as a bridge between the methods of Sander [18], Chirikjian [19], and Sonneville, Cardona and Brüls [20,21], based on the special Euclidean group, and the aforementioned ones, based on Lie algebraic quantities. A distinguishing feature of the present approach is that it obviates the need for any interpolation associated with the reconstruction of the shape of a rod from a finite sampling of its placement in space.…”
Section: The Lie Algebra and The Lie Group Associated With The Rod Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context the spatial description (referred to as fixed-pole formulation) has proven to be beneficial [31]. Recent results on Lie group modeling of beams can be found in [77,78].…”
Section: Geometric Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the relatively low computational complexity of a single element, this restriction can often be compensated for by a finer discretization of the beam model. For example, Sonneville, Cardona, and Brüls [28] achieve good convergence characteristics and small approximation errors for a standard test case based on a bent Cantilever beam subjected to a fixed load.…”
Section: Interplay Of Rotations and Translationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Lie algebra se(3) associated with the special Euclidean group SE(3) := SO(3) Id T (3, R), the semidirect product of rotations and translations in three dimensions [28]. By identifying the local material frames, i.e.…”
Section: Interplay Of Rotations and Translationsmentioning
confidence: 99%