2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.104.123516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometrical meaning of statistical isotropy of smooth random fields in two dimensions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, it is clear that the ensemble average at any given point cannot be equated to the volume average of the same tensor over the entire manifold. The constancy of Σ is a consequence of the fields being homogeneous (see, e.g., Adler 1981;Chingangbam et al 2021), so when the fields are inhomogeneous, we cannot invoke ergodicity, and generically w w…”
Section: Ensemble Average and Ergodicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, it is clear that the ensemble average at any given point cannot be equated to the volume average of the same tensor over the entire manifold. The constancy of Σ is a consequence of the fields being homogeneous (see, e.g., Adler 1981;Chingangbam et al 2021), so when the fields are inhomogeneous, we cannot invoke ergodicity, and generically w w…”
Section: Ensemble Average and Ergodicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the authors have written a series of papers on the application of the MTs to the low redshift matter density field as traced by galaxies (Appleby et al 2018a(Appleby et al , 2018b. The ensemble average of the MTs measured from isotropic and anisotropic, Gaussian random fields were considered in Chingangbam & Yogendran (2017), Appleby et al (2018b), and Chingangbam et al (2021). Anisotropic random fields were subsequently explored further in Klatt et al (2022), including higher-rank statistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where a > 0, b > 0 are parameters that depend on the cosmological model [49]. Due to this reason, for accurate quantification of the statistical significance of deviation from SI, we use the median value of α, denoted by α (G) obtained from the 1000 simulations along with the 99% confidence interval.…”
Section: Statistical Isotropy Of the Haslam Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where a > 0, b > 0 are parameters that depend on the cosmological model [50]. Hence the standard deviation of α, which we denote by σ α , will not be equivalent to the usual 68% confidence interval.…”
Section: Quantifying the Statistical Significance Of α And Error Barsmentioning
confidence: 99%