1979
DOI: 10.1364/ao.18.003908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometrical form factor in the laser radar equation: an experimental determination

Abstract: This paper describes a practical method for determination of the geometrical form factor in the laser radar equation. Based on the laser radar equation and the statistical homogeneity in the spatial aerosol distribution, the factor can be calculated from the field observations by laser radar. Some examples of correction by this factor are also presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We estimate that the full overlap is achieved at 150 m. Comparing the AECL results in the few lowest range bins against the in-situ (flight-level) data requires careful consideration of the incomplete overlap problem. In this work, we have used the method of [5] to correct the signal below 150 m by using calibration data in clear air. Despite the correction, we acknowledge that evaluating lidar data in the overlap region can be problematic and associated with a source of error.…”
Section: Figure 1 Aecl Design With a Rotatable Beam Bendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimate that the full overlap is achieved at 150 m. Comparing the AECL results in the few lowest range bins against the in-situ (flight-level) data requires careful consideration of the incomplete overlap problem. In this work, we have used the method of [5] to correct the signal below 150 m by using calibration data in clear air. Despite the correction, we acknowledge that evaluating lidar data in the overlap region can be problematic and associated with a source of error.…”
Section: Figure 1 Aecl Design With a Rotatable Beam Bendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been used to determine the profile of the overlap factor [37][38][39][40][41]. Our overlap correction is determined by experimental methods such as those described by Sasano et al [37]. The final variable NRB can be expressed as [42]:…”
Section: Measurement Site Instruments and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each vertical scan duration was about 2 min, corresponding to an average of 50-100 shots per profile (Table 3). The theoretical lidar blind distance r 0 for optimal nearfield overlap is about 250 m. In order to reduce the blind distance from the lidar, a geometrical form factor (GFF) has been deduced by using horizontal profile measurements in the direction of a south (from the burning site) homogeneous clear atmosphere area before the start of the burning (Sasano et al, 1979). The GFF, deduced experimentally, has been applied in each profile obtained during the burning period, to reduce the blind distance from 250 m to 105 m.…”
Section: Scanning Lidar Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%