2010 International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communication and 2010 Asia-Pacific Conference on Information Technol 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cicc-itoe.2010.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometrical Attack Robust Spatial Digital Watermarking Based on Improved SIFT

Abstract: Presents an effective against geometric attack robustness of digital watermarking algorithm based on improved SIFT(Scale Invariant Feature Transform). The proposal achieves watermark synchronization using improved Scale-Invariant Feature Transform; Some suitable feature points are selected to form circular patches of the carrier image. The circular patches are divided into sectors, and watermark is embedded into the sectors using spatial odds and even quantification. Watermark is extracted from an odd-even det… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A great variety of feature extraction methods has been proposed in the literature. Lately, there is a tendency of using the so-called scale-space methods such as SIFT [20] for watermarking purposes [18,[21][22][23]. In our study, we employed this as well as other feature detectors proposed in the literature, but not in the context of image watermarking, during the past few years.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great variety of feature extraction methods has been proposed in the literature. Lately, there is a tendency of using the so-called scale-space methods such as SIFT [20] for watermarking purposes [18,[21][22][23]. In our study, we employed this as well as other feature detectors proposed in the literature, but not in the context of image watermarking, during the past few years.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%