1996
DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(95)10080-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometrical aspects of superplastic flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spherulitic domains initially present in some samples progressively disappear within increasing strain but slightly disturb the regular spacing of porosity bands at lower strain. The formation of a shape-preferred orientation at constant grain shape in combination with the occurrence of cavities suggests cooperative grain boundary sliding [Zelin and Mukherjee, 1996]. In our experiments, the shear bands show an orientation and kinematics that are similar to those of C′-type or ECC (extensional crenulation cleavage) shear bands from natural mylonite zones [Passchier and Trouw, 1996].…”
Section: Microstructuresupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The spherulitic domains initially present in some samples progressively disappear within increasing strain but slightly disturb the regular spacing of porosity bands at lower strain. The formation of a shape-preferred orientation at constant grain shape in combination with the occurrence of cavities suggests cooperative grain boundary sliding [Zelin and Mukherjee, 1996]. In our experiments, the shear bands show an orientation and kinematics that are similar to those of C′-type or ECC (extensional crenulation cleavage) shear bands from natural mylonite zones [Passchier and Trouw, 1996].…”
Section: Microstructuresupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Thus, as in the case of Pb-Sn eutectic alloy, the appearance of region I was attributed to the presence of impurities and their influence on GBM and dislocation motion, which were needed for the accommodation of GBS. The dominance of GBS was considered in developing several models for superplastic deformation 1,5,34 but the variation in their approaches was in terms of the details of the accommodation processes. Experimental observations and theoretical considerations suggests that GBS takes place either at individual grain boundaries or along the common surface of many grains (cooperative GBS).…”
Section: Grain Boundary Slidingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rheological similarity between fine-grained ice and superplastically deformed metals and ceramics led Goldsby and Kohlstedt [1997] to identify the mechanism in their samples as grain boundary sliding (GBS), which embodies numerous microstructural styles [e.g., Zelin and Mukherjee, 1995] that have the common feature that grain boundaries are very mobile.…”
Section: Grain-size-sensitive (Gss) Creepmentioning
confidence: 99%