2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2021.114038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric uncertainty in patient-specific cardiovascular modeling with convolutional dropout networks

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By ignoring inter-patient variability, this method is not personalized to each patient. As expected, these uncertainties in anatomy and boundary conditions significantly affect model predictions [78,2,62,60,34,67,32].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…By ignoring inter-patient variability, this method is not personalized to each patient. As expected, these uncertainties in anatomy and boundary conditions significantly affect model predictions [78,2,62,60,34,67,32].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…We added several seeds to this region and applied a region‐growing algorithm to get the full aortocoronary domain. We selected this hybrid method among others described in the literature 32,33 to avoid modern automatic approaches that require specific expert training 34 and can induce errors similar to manual segmentations 35 . The selected method is simpler and commonly employed among physicians.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…training 34 and can induce errors similar to manual segmentations. 35 The selected method is simpler and commonly employed among physicians. An extensive range of voxel intensity values can be found in the coronary lumen due to factors like the presence of artifacts and tiny coronary arteries, whose diameters are comparable to the image resolution.…”
Section: Ccta Image Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main sources of uncertainty may be ascribed to (1) boundary conditions, (2) geometry and (3) material parameters. Scarce literature is available on quantification and/or propagation of (1) boundary condition uncertainties 24,25 and (2) geometry uncertainties 26,27 . Regarding (3) material parameters, 28 compared the uncertainties of different non‐Newtonian viscosity models for small Reynolds numbers in an idealized bifurcation model of a vein, however surrogate uncertainties are neglected and ad‐hoc assumptions on the parameter statistics made.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scarce literature is available on quantification and/or propagation of (1) boundary condition uncertainties 24,25 and (2) geometry uncertainties. 26,27 Regarding (3) material parameters, 28 compared the uncertainties of different non-Newtonian viscosity models for small Reynolds numbers in an idealized bifurcation model of a vein, however surrogate uncertainties are neglected and ad-hoc assumptions on the parameter statistics made. The authors are aware of only one study 29 that considered all sources (1-3), however for a Newtonian fluid only.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%