2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric SMOTE a geometrically enhanced drop-in replacement for SMOTE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental procedure included a comparison of five oversamplers using five classifiers and three evaluation metrics. Specifically, the oversampling algorithms were Geometric-SMOTE (G-SMOTE) [15], the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) [16], Borderline-SMOTE (B-SMOTE) [17], the adaptive synthetic sampling technique (ADASYN) [18] and random oversampling (ROS), while no oversampling was included as a baseline method. Results show that G-SMOTE outperforms every other oversampling technique, for the selected evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental procedure included a comparison of five oversamplers using five classifiers and three evaluation metrics. Specifically, the oversampling algorithms were Geometric-SMOTE (G-SMOTE) [15], the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) [16], Borderline-SMOTE (B-SMOTE) [17], the adaptive synthetic sampling technique (ADASYN) [18] and random oversampling (ROS), while no oversampling was included as a baseline method. Results show that G-SMOTE outperforms every other oversampling technique, for the selected evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30] Secondly, due to the cohort data being highly imbalanced, with the majority of cases being mild/ordinary, we explored the use of four oversampling methods to address the imbalance distribution issue. [31][32][33][34] Third, we interpreted the importance of features using the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) framework and identified the features with the highest predictive power. [35] The evaluated predictive models yielded high accuracy and identified predictive imaging and clinical features consistent with prior findings.…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Douzas et al [12] proposed an oversampling method based on k-means clustering and SMOTE. Douzas and Bacao [13] proposed a geometric SMOTE which generates synthetic samples in a hypersphere around each selected minority instance. Mathew et al [14] proposed a weighted kernel-based SMOTE (WK-SMOTE) approach which generates synthetic positive class samples in feature space, WK-SMOTE can overcome the limitation of linear interpolation of SMOTE.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a sample x which belongs to cluster A, the Silhouette coefficient of x is defined by Eq. (13).…”
Section: B Performance Evaluation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%