1996
DOI: 10.1016/0010-4485(96)00015-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric reasoning for the extraction of form features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(a2) show an example object with non-trivial feature interactions and its depression. In (b) the solid lines show the cavity graph of the depression, which [3,11] means that two faces 3 and 11 are uniÿed and are represented by one node. Only if the original cavity graph is augmented with three virtual links as shown in (b) by dashed links the form features of the object can be correctly identiÿed and extracted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(a2) show an example object with non-trivial feature interactions and its depression. In (b) the solid lines show the cavity graph of the depression, which [3,11] means that two faces 3 and 11 are uniÿed and are represented by one node. Only if the original cavity graph is augmented with three virtual links as shown in (b) by dashed links the form features of the object can be correctly identiÿed and extracted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most machine operations require high level semantic features such as pockets, slots, and holes instead of these low level geometric entities. Therefore, in order to achieve true manufacturing automation, several di erent mechanisms have been proposed to automatically extract the high level semantic features from the low level entities in solid model representations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. While these mechanisms can successfully recognize decoupled or isolated primitive features, they have achieved very limited success in identifying and describing compound depressions generated by the interaction of several semantic features [5,[12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case et al [7] implemented such a classification for CAD/CAM integration and using a similar feature classification scheme, Xu and Hinduja [57] proposed a feature recognition approach to recognize rough machining features in 2-1/2D components. A boundarybased technique for feature extraction is presented by Qamhiyah et al [36]. A multiprocessor algorithm for fast feature recognition is presented in Regli et al [38].…”
Section: Form-feature Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Venuvinod and Wong [25] used the advantages of faceedge adjacency graphs and expert systems to extract features by partitioning multi-attributed adjacency graphs into sub-graphs. Qamhiyah et al [26] demonstrated a technique to extract form features sequentially from B-rep models by interrogating its loops and planar faces, but this is not suitable for non-planar faces of the surfaces of the objects. Gadh and Prinz [27] developed a new "filter-function approach" to recognise different types of geometric features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%