2017
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2016.2631260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric Priors for Gaussian Process Implicit Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maybe due to miss detections of smaller curves, this first 2D then 3D approach has not been shown to work robustly in cluttered scene. While sharing the same basic segmentation idea as above, our geometric segmentation CNN performs no fitting, but only provides plausibility maps for further geometric verification if needed, or even just as shape priors to more complex scene reconstruction [20], e.g., tree trunks as cylindrical shapes.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Maybe due to miss detections of smaller curves, this first 2D then 3D approach has not been shown to work robustly in cluttered scene. While sharing the same basic segmentation idea as above, our geometric segmentation CNN performs no fitting, but only provides plausibility maps for further geometric verification if needed, or even just as shape priors to more complex scene reconstruction [20], e.g., tree trunks as cylindrical shapes.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a segmentation map could already be useful for more complex tasks [20], yet for the sake of a robust primitive fitting pipeline, one cannot fully trust this segmentation map as it inevitably contains misclassification, just like all other image semantic segmentations. Fortunately, by separating pixels belonging to individual primitive classes, our original multi-model problem is converted to an easier multiinstance problem.…”
Section: Framework Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new belief then feeds back in to the planning module to replan the observation locations, and this process continues. Traditionally, active perception problems arise while using vision sensing modalities (Chen et al, 2011), although recently there has also been a need for new formulations suitable for sensing modalities with depth information, such as 3D laser (Patten et al, 2017), RGB-D (van Hoof et al, 2014;Patten et al, 2016;Martens et al, 2017) and thermal (Cunningham-Nelson et al, 2015) modalities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This formulation is motivated by scenarios where there are two complementary sensing modalities. For example, a long-range laser sensor (Bargoti et al, 2015) detects the presence and locations of trees on a farm, while a close-range high-resolution RGB-D sensor (Martens et al, 2017;Peng et al, 2016) performs the primary task of characterising the fruit in the trees. The planner needs to balance the use of these two modalities in order for the robots to discover as many objects as possible while also making sufficient close-range observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One popular choice for object modeling are Gaussian Processes Implicit Surfaces (GPIS) 17 , that have recently been applied extensively to the field of haptic exploration 18,19,20,21,22 . Building on GPIS, an extension to incorporate prior knowledge has been proposed to enhance the probabilistic reconstruction of explored objects 23 .…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%