2018
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2018.2840511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric Power Fall-Off in Radar Sounding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bailey and others, 1964; Gudmandsen, 1969; Bamber and others, 2013; Fretwell and others, 2013). In the last two decades, the emphasis has expanded to the investigation of the geometric, thermal and material properties of the basal interface, by using the sounder-appropriate radar equation to solve for either basal reflectivity or echo character (Peters and others, 2005; Oswald and Gogineni, 2008; Schroeder and others, 2013; Grima and others, 2014b; Haynes and others, 2018b; Haynes, 2020).…”
Section: Ice Sheet and Glacier Bed Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bailey and others, 1964; Gudmandsen, 1969; Bamber and others, 2013; Fretwell and others, 2013). In the last two decades, the emphasis has expanded to the investigation of the geometric, thermal and material properties of the basal interface, by using the sounder-appropriate radar equation to solve for either basal reflectivity or echo character (Peters and others, 2005; Oswald and Gogineni, 2008; Schroeder and others, 2013; Grima and others, 2014b; Haynes and others, 2018b; Haynes, 2020).…”
Section: Ice Sheet and Glacier Bed Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the most widely and successfully studied basal feature with radar sounding data has been subglacial water bodies, particularly subglacial lakes in Antarctica using the principle that subglacial water results in reflections brighter than surrounding bed echoes in radar data (Oswald and Robin, 1973; Peters and others, 2005; Wright and Siegert, 2012). Because of the coherent specular character of subglacial water, small fractional areas can dominate the echo both in terms of reflectivity and geometric spreading (Haynes and others, 2018b). This has been exploited to automatically detect lakes in radar sounding data (Carter and others, 2007; Ilisei and others, 2018).…”
Section: Ice Sheet and Glacier Bed Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thin (~10 cm) section analyses from ice cores, while providing direct orientation estimates for the majority of grains within each section, are often conducted at depth intervals of tens of metres, with each analysis capturing the local decimetre-wide fabric regime, as is the case for the WAIS Divide deep ice core (WDC) at an average depth interval of 40 metres (Fitzpatrick et al, 2014). In contrast, waveform-based methods average out fabric properties in bulk where, for radar systems, the planar footprint of which the COF is averaged from is dependent on the radiation patterns of the radar antennas and increases linearly through depth, and can be approximated as the radius of the first Fresnel zone (Haynes et al, 2018). As the antennas used in this study have a relatively wide half-power beamwidth (±30 • ), the footprint of the ApRES system would have a radius of approximately 1/4 of the centre wavelength (~1 m) near the surface, but reaches to approximately 1000 m at a depth of 1500 m. Therefore, the bulk COF estimates obtained from ApRES is averaged from a much larger area at depth than near the surface.…”
Section: Methods Comparisons and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As bed roughness increases, the radar pulse is scattered over a greater range of angles; this results in a 15 decrease in peak returned-power, and an increase in the trailing edge of the echo. The mathematical formulation of this relationship depends on the physical model for electromagnetic interference (phase coherence, or incoherence) and the statistical model for the subglacial interface (Berry, 1973;Peters et al, 2005;Haynes et al, 2018). The most commonly employed scattering model for the RES of glacier beds assumes phase-coherent interference, 'smoothly undulating' Gaussian statistics for rms roughness and radial isotropy (Berry, 1975;Peters et al, 2005;MacGregor et al, 2013;Grima et al, 2014;Schroeder 20 et al, 2015).…”
Section: Estimating Fine-scale Roughness and The 'Peakiness Index'mentioning
confidence: 99%