1992
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.46.13293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric ordering, surface chemistry, band bending, and work function at decapped GaAs(100) surfaces

Abstract: We present a comprehensive study of epitaxially grown and As-coated GaAs(100) surfaces as a function of As desorption temperature and background pressure. We have used low-energy electron diffraction to determine surface reconstruction, and core-level and valence-band soft-x-ray photoemission spectroscopy to perform chemical and electronic characterization of these surfaces. We find gradual changes in surface geometry and composition, and a limited (-120 meV) Fermi-level movement over numerous reconstructions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
42
1
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
10
42
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The work function is highly dependent on the details of the surface and its environment, as demonstrated by its known dependence on crystallographic orientation [4][5][6] , pressure/temperature [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and pH of solution 14,15 , interaction with adjacent solvents 16 , and surface molecular physisorption 17,18 and chemisorption 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work function is highly dependent on the details of the surface and its environment, as demonstrated by its known dependence on crystallographic orientation [4][5][6] , pressure/temperature [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and pH of solution 14,15 , interaction with adjacent solvents 16 , and surface molecular physisorption 17,18 and chemisorption 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Circular Ga droplets introduced by over annealing have been found on the surface by other group [8]. This is believed to be due to the decomposition of the GaAs surface during over-annealing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The surface component shifted to lower binding energies is well known to stem from As atoms of the (4 × 2) reconstructed phase and is, therefore, labeled As 4×2 . [38][39][40] The surface component B shifted to higher binding energies is usually not observed at the (4×2) reconstructed phase. In our experiments, we could observe this component only when we observed a significant (n × 6) symmetry in LEED.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%