2010
DOI: 10.5802/aif.2581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric optics expansions with amplification for hyperbolic boundary value problems: Linear problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
122
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We justify the evolutionarity of the amplitude equation by making the link with the vanishing of the so-called Lopatinskii determinant. This part of our analysis is rather similar to an observation recently made in [15], see also [10]. Moreover, we prove that Hunter's stability condition holds true as soon as the amplitude equation is of evolutionary type, and exhibit a Hamiltonian structure under some technical assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We justify the evolutionarity of the amplitude equation by making the link with the vanishing of the so-called Lopatinskii determinant. This part of our analysis is rather similar to an observation recently made in [15], see also [10]. Moreover, we prove that Hunter's stability condition holds true as soon as the amplitude equation is of evolutionary type, and exhibit a Hamiltonian structure under some technical assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Even though this result may not seem very surprising (it was more or less conjectured by Hunter, see [12, page 193]), it is in sharp contrast with the case of hyperbolic boundary value problems for which the uniform Lopatinskii condition fails in the hyperbolic region, in which there is a loss of derivatives. Indeed, the results in [10] point out an amplification of oscillations at the boundary in that situation, which means that the regime of weakly nonlinear geometric optics corresponds to initial oscillations with a much smaller amplitude than what we consider here.…”
Section: General Framework and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[3,4] for the definitions. In [10], Coulombel and Guès show that the loss of regularity in (1.9), (1.10) in such a case is optimal. They also prove that the well posedness result with loss of regularity is independent of Lipschitzean zero order terms B but is not independent of bounded zero order terms.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%