2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric morphometrics on juvenile crania: Exploring age and sex variation in an Australian population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ontogenetic trajectory has been developed as a methodology to assess the developmental differences between species and compare the divergent growth processes when assessing ancestry (Klingenberg, 1998). Ontogenetic trajectories are often created by connecting juvenile to adult data points; however, the inclusion of seven age‐cohorts in our ontogenetic trajectories provided an additional time‐depth to our analysis similar to the research completed on the juvenile crania from a population in Australia (Noble et al, 2019). As a result, we were able to identify similarities and differences throughout the stages of development in the growth trends between males and females (Figure 1) and their ontogenetic trajectories (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ontogenetic trajectory has been developed as a methodology to assess the developmental differences between species and compare the divergent growth processes when assessing ancestry (Klingenberg, 1998). Ontogenetic trajectories are often created by connecting juvenile to adult data points; however, the inclusion of seven age‐cohorts in our ontogenetic trajectories provided an additional time‐depth to our analysis similar to the research completed on the juvenile crania from a population in Australia (Noble et al, 2019). As a result, we were able to identify similarities and differences throughout the stages of development in the growth trends between males and females (Figure 1) and their ontogenetic trajectories (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test allowed the determination of significant morphological differences between the sexes and between the age‐cohorts as well as determined if there are significant differences in the pattern of morphological changes over time in males from females. The sex‐specific ontogenetic trajectories for each cervical vertebra were created using the seven age‐cohorts to provide greater time depth to the analysis than the two cohort trajectories commonly used in previous research (Noble, Cardini, Flavel, & Franklin, 2019). For each age‐cohort, the average male and female PC1 and PC2 scores were calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy attributed to age estimation using computed tomography (CT) has been validated through baseline studies (e.g. (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)). Recent research has applied the Suchey-Brooks method in the assessment of the symphysis in CT images (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they argue that differences in brain morphology may originate from weight differences between the sexes; studies have shown that there are regional differences even after weight correction 23 . Phenotypic sex is systematically related to brain asymmetry 24 . Gender differences in cognitive function have also been demonstrated, many studies coincide in their results, where there is an advantage for women in tests of verbal fluency and psychomotor speed and the advantage of men in the visual-spatial aspect 25 .…”
Section: Morphometry and Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%