2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric morphometric analysis of the crown morphology of the lower first premolar of hominins, with special attention to Pleistocene Homo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
109
0
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
5
109
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, SH hominins present dentitions that are as "Neanderthal" as those recovered from Kra pina or Hortus, and whose larger sample size allow us to consider population variability. With the exceptions mentioned above, the SH hominins show similar or more pronounced degrees and frequencies than H. heidelbergensis and even H. neanderthalensis for some of the dental traits (this study; see also Gomez-Robles et al, 2008, 2011Gomez-Robles, 2010). The highly derived state of the Sima de los Huesos dentition cannot be compared to the degree of "neanderthalization" of other penecontemporaneous populations (Ta ttersall, 2007(Ta ttersall, , 2009 Bermudez de Castro et al, 2009;Stringer, 2009;Dennell et al, 2010) Wagner et al, 2010).…”
supporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, SH hominins present dentitions that are as "Neanderthal" as those recovered from Kra pina or Hortus, and whose larger sample size allow us to consider population variability. With the exceptions mentioned above, the SH hominins show similar or more pronounced degrees and frequencies than H. heidelbergensis and even H. neanderthalensis for some of the dental traits (this study; see also Gomez-Robles et al, 2008, 2011Gomez-Robles, 2010). The highly derived state of the Sima de los Huesos dentition cannot be compared to the degree of "neanderthalization" of other penecontemporaneous populations (Ta ttersall, 2007(Ta ttersall, , 2009 Bermudez de Castro et al, 2009;Stringer, 2009;Dennell et al, 2010) Wagner et al, 2010).…”
supporting
confidence: 48%
“…This shape is typical of the Neanderthal lineage but more pronounced in the SH sample than in other Middle Pleistocene groups such as Arago or even some classic Neanderthals such as some from Krapina and Le Moustier (Gomez-Robles et al, 2008;Gomez-Robles, 2010). The P 4 S present an asymmetrical contour, a mesially displaced metaconid, and accessory lingual cusps in association with a continuous transverse ridge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…One way of measuring the subtle differences in shape between objects is using GMA and this approach is being applied increasingly to clarify genetic contribution to various morphological features [48][49][50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: New Methods Of Shape Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods are less practical for quantifying tooth shape, as they require micro-CT data that are costly and time-consuming to collect, limiting the sampling potential. Two-dimensional morphometrics has been successfully used to examine occlusal morphology in hominins (G omez-Robles, 2008;Gomez-Robles et al, 2007), rodents (Macholan, 2006;Renaud, 1999), and primates (White, 2009), and has been found to provide more shape information than simple linear measures (Bernal, 2007). Twodimensional photographs of the lingual aspect of the tooth were deemed most appropriate for our analysis for several reasons: (1) the majority of shape variation in the taxa sampled occurs in this plane (roughly parasagittal); (2) the lateral aspect of the tooth is relatively flat, thus allowing repeatable positioning of the tooth for imaging; and (3) several homologous landmarks were identifiable on the lingual surfaces of these teeth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%