1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-96676-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric Invariant Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
546
0
18

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 562 publications
(575 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
546
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, by compactifying the quotient of ^ by Sp(2g, Z), Satake and Bailey- Borel [1966] give a compactification JK g of Jt g such that JK g is a projective variety and J# g -^g has codimension 2 in Jf g , showing in particular that there are no nonconstant holomorphic functions on J( g . MUMFORD. A third, and purely algebraic, construction of the moduli space of curves was given as an application by Mumford and Deligne of Mumford's "Geometric Invariant Theory" (Mumford [1965], DeligneMumford [1969]). Here the extra structure tacked on to a curve is exactly that of a particular projective embedding: namely, we consider curves C embedded in projective space P 5^-6 by the linear system of sections of the third power of the canonical bundle (w c ) 03 (the third power is chosen because it gives an embedding of any curve of genus > 2, and is the smallest power to do so).…”
Section: Families Of Curves and Degenerations: Spaces Of Moduli And Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, by compactifying the quotient of ^ by Sp(2g, Z), Satake and Bailey- Borel [1966] give a compactification JK g of Jt g such that JK g is a projective variety and J# g -^g has codimension 2 in Jf g , showing in particular that there are no nonconstant holomorphic functions on J( g . MUMFORD. A third, and purely algebraic, construction of the moduli space of curves was given as an application by Mumford and Deligne of Mumford's "Geometric Invariant Theory" (Mumford [1965], DeligneMumford [1969]). Here the extra structure tacked on to a curve is exactly that of a particular projective embedding: namely, we consider curves C embedded in projective space P 5^-6 by the linear system of sections of the third power of the canonical bundle (w c ) 03 (the third power is chosen because it gives an embedding of any curve of genus > 2, and is the smallest power to do so).…”
Section: Families Of Curves and Degenerations: Spaces Of Moduli And Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One has only to remark that a degenerate Desargues configuration D π of the first kind (respectively 2 nd kind, respectively 3 rd kind) admits 4 (respectively 3, respectively 1) complete quadrangles. In the same way as we deduced Theorem 1.2 from Lemma 1.1 we obtain from this Recall that a binary form f (x, y) of degree 6 is called stable if f admits no root of multiplicity ≥ 3 and that the space M b 6 of stable binary sextics exists (see [7]). In this section, we present the construction of Stephanos (see [11] -in a slightly different set up) associating to every Desargues configuration D π a binary sextic J π in a canonical way.…”
Section: The Moduli Space Of Desargues Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Take a chiral gauge theory which is known to have D flat directions and no supersymmetric ground state, add a number of gauge singlet superfields equal to the number of flat directions, and add a tree level superpotential which couples the gauge singlets to the gauge invariant polynomials of chiral superfields which parametrize the flat directions [17], so that the only remaining classically flat directions have unbroken gauge symmetry. Most of the resulting models do not have a stable supersymmetry breaking ground state, but our example is not the unique DSB model which could serve as a supersymmetry breaking hidden sector.…”
Section: A Hidden Sector Model Of Dynamical Supersymmetry Breakingmentioning
confidence: 99%