2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2013.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric imperfections and lower-bound methods used to calculate knock-down factors for axially compressed composite cylindrical shells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
65
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The imperfection sensitivity exhibited by cylindrical shells renders particular emphasis on their design against instability in axial compression. Therefore, robust design approaches are being developed and validated, such as single perturbation load, single perturbation displacement, single boundary perturbation approaches, and their modifications (see, e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]) in order to replace the existing overconservative design guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imperfection sensitivity exhibited by cylindrical shells renders particular emphasis on their design against instability in axial compression. Therefore, robust design approaches are being developed and validated, such as single perturbation load, single perturbation displacement, single boundary perturbation approaches, and their modifications (see, e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]) in order to replace the existing overconservative design guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinear structural analysis based on a path-following technique is commonly used to trace the response curve and to predict the load-carrying capacity of shell structures in the presence of buckling [2,5]. Snap-through and snap-back responses are two main phenomenons usually associated with the buckling of shell structures [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the arc-length method [7] and norm flow method [8], have been proved to deal with the snap-through case very well. However, the above methods encounter difficulties with a snap-back response of cylindrical shells [9], where extremely sharp turning angles are present [3,5,10]. A significant reduction of the incremental step size is required to distinguish properly the two closely spaced path segments near the limit point [5,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations