2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-06527-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric error sensitivity analysis for a 6-axis welding equipment based on Lie theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper proposes a new SA method to quantify the impact of geometric error on the machining accuracy and extract the key geometric errors. By comparison with the existing SA methods [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], the superiorities of the new SA method are listed as follows: (1) A novel sensitivity index is proposed to solve the problem that the SA results of angular error and linear error need compared separately, which significantly simplifies the SA procedures and improves the computational efficiency. ( 2) The proposed SA model takes into account the characteristic of geometric error changes with different machining positions, which solves the problem that the universality of SA results obtained by assuming all the angular errors and linear errors have the same value is poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper proposes a new SA method to quantify the impact of geometric error on the machining accuracy and extract the key geometric errors. By comparison with the existing SA methods [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], the superiorities of the new SA method are listed as follows: (1) A novel sensitivity index is proposed to solve the problem that the SA results of angular error and linear error need compared separately, which significantly simplifies the SA procedures and improves the computational efficiency. ( 2) The proposed SA model takes into account the characteristic of geometric error changes with different machining positions, which solves the problem that the universality of SA results obtained by assuming all the angular errors and linear errors have the same value is poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity coefficients were calculated by taking only one machining point as an example to determine the key error components. Fang et al [20] developed a new SA model by utilizing the Lie theory. Due to the units of angular error and linear error are different, the sensitivity coefficients of two kinds errors were calculated and compared respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper proposes a new SA method to quantify the influence degree of geometric error on the machining accuracy and extract the key geometric error components. By comparison with the existing SA methods [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], the superiorities of the new SA method are listed as follows: (1) A novel sensitivity index is proposed to solve the problem that the SA results of angular error and linear error need compared separately, which significantly simplified the SA procedures and improves the computational efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this, dimension relevant sensitivity analysis of 2 stretchable spherical relevant source was carried out in this investigation. From a detailed literature survey [19][20][21][22][23], it could be understood that experimental investigations carried out on several fusion relevant welding methodologies, employing the sensitivity relevant analysis are limited. For example, Kim et al [20] in their experimental work, employed sensitivity based analysis to identify and compare the individual impacts of the employed attributes of the automated gas metal arc joining process, on the geometry of employed bead, so as to validate the measurement related flaws on the uncertainty values w.r. t anticipated parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%