2017
DOI: 10.1109/msp.2017.2693418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric Deep Learning: Going beyond Euclidean data

Abstract: Many scientific fields study data with an underlying structure that is a non-Euclidean space. Some examples include social networks in computational social sciences, sensor networks in communications, functional networks in brain imaging, regulatory networks in genetics, and meshed surfaces in computer graphics. In many applications, such geometric data are large and complex (in the case of social networks, on the scale of billions), and are natural targets for machine learning techniques. In particular, we wo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
1,629
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,687 publications
(1,763 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(177 reference statements)
2
1,629
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, a promising direction is the introduction of product spaces within geometric deep learning [BBL*17] pipelines, where the data is in the form of signals defined on top of a manifold. Our proposed discretization of the (product) Laplace–Beltrami operator, as well as its spectral decomposition, can be directly employed in such pipelines, enabling new forms of structured prediction in a range of challenging problems in vision and graphics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a promising direction is the introduction of product spaces within geometric deep learning [BBL*17] pipelines, where the data is in the form of signals defined on top of a manifold. Our proposed discretization of the (product) Laplace–Beltrami operator, as well as its spectral decomposition, can be directly employed in such pipelines, enabling new forms of structured prediction in a range of challenging problems in vision and graphics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the number of 2D views rendered from a 3D model must be large enough so that the entire shape surface is captured as accurate as possible [KAMC17]. Usually, these approaches (and the volumetric representation which will come later) miss some levels of details during the process of transforming 3D shapes into 2D views [BBL*17]. Besides, different parts of a shape may be appeared in more than one view, therefore, an effective technique needs to be taken to unify the parts specifically [KAMC17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more information on applying CNN to spectral domain, we refer the readers to a recent article by Bronstein et al . [BBL*17]. They present an in‐depth discussion on the considerations for CNN applications in shape analysis tasks for spatial and spectral domains.…”
Section: Data‐driven 3d Shape Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent years, several methods have been proposed for analyzing and processing 3D shapes by building on the success of machine learning methods, and especially those based on deep learning (see, for example, recent overviews in [MRB*16, BBL*17]). These methods are based on the notion that the solutions to many problems in geometric data analysis can benefit from large data repositories.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%