2017
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.95.012148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric approach to optimal nonequilibrium control: Minimizing dissipation in nanomagnetic spin systems

Abstract: Optimal control of nanomagnets has become an urgent problem for the field of spintronics as technological tools approach thermodynamically determined limits of efficiency. In complex, fluctuating systems, such as nanomagnetic bits, finding optimal protocols is challenging, requiring detailed information about the dynamical fluctuations of the controlled system. We provide a physically transparent derivation of a metric tensor for which the length of a protocol is proportional to its dissipation. This perspecti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us finally mention that, after a first version of this paper appeared as a preprint, several other groups obtained results that are closely related to Theorem 3 ( 25 27 ).…”
Section: Discussion and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Let us finally mention that, after a first version of this paper appeared as a preprint, several other groups obtained results that are closely related to Theorem 3 ( 25 27 ).…”
Section: Discussion and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[231][232][233] Several groups have used this framework to examine optimal protocols in model systems. 148,[234][235][236][237][238][239][240] Applying this theory to bistable systems representing thermally activated processes 241 leads to the intuition that energetically efficient control requires relatively slow perturbation when the system is on the verge of a major transition, essentially letting random thermal fluctuations kick the system over a given barrier 'for free' without energy input from the controller. Other extensions have generalized this control framework to nonequilibrium steady states 242,243 and to models of rotary machines 244 and chemical reaction networks.…”
Section: Deterministic Drivingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main ideas were introduced for classical systems in a series of seminal papers in the 80 s by Weinhold and Andresen, Berry and Salamon, among others [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. More recently, the field saw a revival following a series of papers initiated by Crooks in 2007 [ 15 , 16 , 17 ], leading to several applications in, e.g., molecular motors [ 18 ], small-scale information processing [ 19 ], nonequilibrium steady states [ 20 , 21 ], and many-body systems [ 22 , 23 ]. The same ideas have been generalised to the quantum regime for unitary dynamics using linear response [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ], and to open system dynamics for Lindbladian systems [ 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%