2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10440-014-9947-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric and Numerical Methods in the Contrast Imaging Problem in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

Abstract: In this article, the contrast imaging problem in nuclear magnetic resonance is modeled as a Mayer problem in optimal control. The optimal solution can be found as an extremal, solution of the Maximum Principle and analyzed with the techniques of geometric control. This leads to a numerical investigation based on so-called indirect methods using the HamPath software. The results are then compared with a direct method implemented within the Bocop toolbox. Finally lmi techniques are used to estimate a global opti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note the use of a scalar product, denoted by a dot, between the gradient vector ∂v ∂x and the controlled dynamics. In [40], it is proposed then to relax strong problem (4) by optimizing over all Borel measures satisfying (7) instead of simply occupation measures, yielding the following "weak" problem:…”
Section: Occupation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note the use of a scalar product, denoted by a dot, between the gradient vector ∂v ∂x and the controlled dynamics. In [40], it is proposed then to relax strong problem (4) by optimizing over all Borel measures satisfying (7) instead of simply occupation measures, yielding the following "weak" problem:…”
Section: Occupation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the numerical approach of [40] proposes to consider a finite subset of the countably many linear constraints on µ given by (7). Then, as a consequence of Tchakaloff's theorem [29,Th.…”
Section: Modal Occupation Measures and Primal Lpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference comes from the fact that the final time is now a parameter and one may study its influence on the optimal trajectories. This was already done in [6], where a state unconstrained and affine scalar control problem of Mayer form was analyzed taking into account the influence of the final time. Moreover, the state constrained case should be clarified with the same tools as those presented in this paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To construct this synthesis we catch the changes along the homotopies and determine the new strategy using the theoretical results. However, if we consider a general optimal control problem depending on a parameter λ, then to get a better synthesis, for a given λ we should compare the cost associated to each component of h −1 ({0}) ∩ {λ = λ}, for each homotopic function h. This approach is crucial when the optimal control problem has for example many local solutions, see [6]. x3(t f ) = +1 19.…”
Section: Synthesis With Respect To I Max and V Maxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the numerical approach of [40] proposes to consider a finite subset of the countably many linear constraints on µ given by (7). Then, as a consequence of Tchakaloff's theorem [29, Th.…”
Section: Modal Occupation Measures and Primal Lpmentioning
confidence: 99%