2001
DOI: 10.1054/arth.2001.23714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric analysis of potential error in using femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
54
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This may have been attributable to the limited surgical exposure. Although there are adequate data to corroborate the importance of accurate femoral component alignment in the coronal plane [9,31,32,38], we are not aware of equally strong evidence concerning sagittal orientation of the femoral component. We found prolonged tourniquet and operating times for MIS TKAs, which is in agreement with other publications [11,24,25,27,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This may have been attributable to the limited surgical exposure. Although there are adequate data to corroborate the importance of accurate femoral component alignment in the coronal plane [9,31,32,38], we are not aware of equally strong evidence concerning sagittal orientation of the femoral component. We found prolonged tourniquet and operating times for MIS TKAs, which is in agreement with other publications [11,24,25,27,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The principal limitation was the lack of a control group in which a standard technique using intra-operative radiographs and EM jigs were used when femoral IM instrumentation was contraindicated. Another restraint included the limited accuracy in measuring angles on plain radiographs according to inherent measurement errors [24]. Finally, another important limitation was the relatively small number of patients treated and the retrospective nature of the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found an alignment of more than ±3°varus/valgus in 25% of cases, independent of the surgeon's experience. Although various guiding tools for alignment have been designed to improve accuracy, several limitations of these instruments have been reported [11][12][13][14]. Errors may be due to variations in the bony anatomy, visual misjudgement by the surgeon or limitations of the technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%