2005
DOI: 10.1090/dimacs/067/07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric algorithms for layered manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Figures 2a and 2b show two triangles of similar dimensions (4 and 6) but having different orientation towards relation to the increment layer of creating the model. Triangle (6), after the slicing process has collapsed, whereas triangle (4) has a slight deformation of the shape. Figures 2c and 2d Figure 3 presents deformation mechanisms for micro-inscriptions that have appeared on the elements made by the rapid prototyping method.…”
Section: Defect Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Figures 2a and 2b show two triangles of similar dimensions (4 and 6) but having different orientation towards relation to the increment layer of creating the model. Triangle (6), after the slicing process has collapsed, whereas triangle (4) has a slight deformation of the shape. Figures 2c and 2d Figure 3 presents deformation mechanisms for micro-inscriptions that have appeared on the elements made by the rapid prototyping method.…”
Section: Defect Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although rapid prototyping devices work very precisely, huge differences often happen between a designed element and a manufactured model. Differences can determine the usefulness of the parts produced in rapid prototyping systems, which seems to be an essential problem [5,6]. This paper presents possible reasons for differences as well as suggests actions that can minimize unexpected effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation