1989
DOI: 10.1109/7.18685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric accuracy in airborne SAR images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expression of At is similar to that shown in [5] with the inclusion of the squint angle. Indeed, it represents the main limitation in the velocity measurement.…”
Section: Position Accuracysupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The expression of At is similar to that shown in [5] with the inclusion of the squint angle. Indeed, it represents the main limitation in the velocity measurement.…”
Section: Position Accuracysupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Such motion errors lead to defocusing, geometric distortions, and radiometric errors in SAR images (Blacknell et al, 1989;Buckreuss, 1991;Franceschetti & Lanari, 1999;Oliver & Quegan, 1998). In this section, we shall discuss these problems and their solutions in details.…”
Section: Problem Of Aircraft Motion Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAR raw signal simulation offers a powerful tool to assess, and subsequently to mitigate, the effect of these motion errors. Time-domain simulation [16][17][18][19] is able to exactly account for the effects of motion errors, but for extended scenes, it is computationally inefficient. Frequencydomain simulation, based on the fast Fourier transform (FFT), for the ideal case was presented in [20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%