2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014wr016841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomechanics of subsurface water withdrawal and injection

Abstract: Land subsidence and uplift, ground ruptures, and induced seismicity are the principal geomechanic effects of groundwater withdrawal and injection. The major environmental consequence of groundwater pumping is anthropogenic land subsidence. The first observation concerning land settlement linked to subsurface processes was made in 1926 by the American geologists Pratt and Johnson, who wrote that ''the cause of subsidence is to be found in the extensive extraction of fluid from beneath the affected area.'' Since… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
97
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
3
97
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This study emphasizes that land subsidence may be caused by groundwater pumping dozens of kilometers away from the affected area. Groundwater depletion is one of the common causes of human‐induced land subsidence (Bakr, ; Galloway & Burbey, ; Gambolati et al, ; Gambolati & Teatini, ; Minderhoud et al, ; Teatini et al, ), and subsidence has been attributed to both onshore and offshore hydrocarbon production (e.g., Chaussard et al, ; Doornhof et al, ; Miandro et al, ; Morton & Bernier, ). We note that our calculated potential subsidence is simplified and does not take into account the transient nature of the process (e.g., Teatini et al, ) or spatially and temporally variable compressibilities, which were assumed constant within facies in this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study emphasizes that land subsidence may be caused by groundwater pumping dozens of kilometers away from the affected area. Groundwater depletion is one of the common causes of human‐induced land subsidence (Bakr, ; Galloway & Burbey, ; Gambolati et al, ; Gambolati & Teatini, ; Minderhoud et al, ; Teatini et al, ), and subsidence has been attributed to both onshore and offshore hydrocarbon production (e.g., Chaussard et al, ; Doornhof et al, ; Miandro et al, ; Morton & Bernier, ). We note that our calculated potential subsidence is simplified and does not take into account the transient nature of the process (e.g., Teatini et al, ) or spatially and temporally variable compressibilities, which were assumed constant within facies in this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing current observations and previous ones, land subsidence of the observation points were identified and then a cumulative land subsidence contour map was plotted. By 2013, the area where cumulative subsidence was greater than 100 mm reached 4942 km 2 . A, B, C, D, E, and F referred to typical funnel zones and their maximum values are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Available Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional land subsidence is a geological process occurring in a long-run equilibrium and inter-coordination between anthropogenic activity and the hydrogeological environment [1,2]. In most areas worldwide, compressible sediments are the material basis and it unbalances the starting point of land subsidence; groundwater drawdown is an inherent drive and its spatial diversity induces an uneven development process of land subsidence [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Better understanding of subsidence processes and geomechanics (elastoplasticity, viscoelastoplasticity, pore volume change, pore pressure change, closing fractures, cavity collapse, and volume units that compact, stretch, and change shape) is paramount for mitigation procedures (Gambolati & Teatini, ; Showstack, ). Since 2000, we have monitored gravity in Jülich, a zone experiencing man‐induced subsidence caused by brown coal mining activity in the Lower Rhine Embayment, Germany (Van Camp et al, ).…”
Section: Monitoring Geophysical Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%