2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2017.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomagnetic activity at Northern Hemisphere's mid-latitude ground stations: How much can be explained using TS05 model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Y component variability, being strongly dependent on the FAC current system because of its poloidal symmetry, is expected to be significantly affected by the unrealistic closure of FAC through the Earth's center in the TS05 model. Statistical results reported by Castillo et al (2017) confirmed that TS05 model performs better in reproducing the X than the Y variability. For this reason, only TS05 simulations for the X-component were used to compute the T-indices.…”
Section: Simulations Of Magnetospheric Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Y component variability, being strongly dependent on the FAC current system because of its poloidal symmetry, is expected to be significantly affected by the unrealistic closure of FAC through the Earth's center in the TS05 model. Statistical results reported by Castillo et al (2017) confirmed that TS05 model performs better in reproducing the X than the Y variability. For this reason, only TS05 simulations for the X-component were used to compute the T-indices.…”
Section: Simulations Of Magnetospheric Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Since, in the TS05 model, the inner ring current and the more distant tail current sheet form a current system circulating close and parallel to the geomagnetic equator, the variability associated to these currents is more clearly retrieved in the X-component of the geomagnetic field (Castillo et al, 2017). We computed estimates of hourly values for the X component at the four northern hemisphere mid-latitude geomagnetic observatories of Coimbra (Portugal), Panagurishte (Bulgary), Novosibirsk (Russia) and Boulder (USA) (see Castillo et al (2017)), for the period 2009-2016, keeping separate contributions from different sources. Table 1 shows the geographic and geomagnetic coordinates of the four observatories.…”
Section: Simulations Of Magnetospheric Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Submitted for publication. Castillo, Y., Pais, M.A., Fernandes, J., Ribeiro, P., Morozova, A.L., Pinheiro, F.J.G. 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amm & Viljanen, 1999), distant magnetospheric sources are the main contributors to geomagnetic activity at mid-latitudes (e.g. Dubyagin et al, 2014;Castillo et al, 2017). The assumption of uniform driving sources is used in this study, since the distance to the auroral and equatorial electrojets is large (Boteler & Pirjola, 2017).…”
Section: Geomagnetic Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to high latitude observatories, where non-uniform ionospheric sources contribute strongly to GICs (e.g., Amm & Viljanen, 1999), distant magnetospheric sources are the main contributors to geomagnetic activity at mid-latitudes (e.g., Castillo et al, 2017;Dubyagin et al, 2014). The assumption of uniform driving sources is used in this study, since the distance to the auroral and equatorial electrojets is large .…”
Section: Geomagnetic Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%