1987
DOI: 10.1029/gl014i001p00072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomagnetic activity and local modulations of cosmic rays circa 1 GV

Abstract: Solar-sector synchronous modula-buted it to reconnection between the GMF and IMF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement between the periodicity of the OCR variations and meteorological and climate responses on the 11-year and century time scales and indications for its agreement on the day-to-day time scale have been discussed in the literature for 30 years. The present situation is that while a number of authors have considered GCR, supplemented at times by high-energy solar protons, as plausible carriers of the solar variability [Ney, 1959;Markson, 1971Markson, , 1983Dickinson, 1975;Herman and Goldberg, 1978b;Lethbridge, 1981;Robie and Hays, 1982;Ely and Huang, 1987], this view has not yet been convincingly supported by detailed comparisons of time variations. While Lundstedt [1984] has made the claim that the well-known dip in VAI following SB crossings was caused by a decrease in GCR flux, Lastovicka [1987] has argued that this is not so, since the dip precedes the decrease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agreement between the periodicity of the OCR variations and meteorological and climate responses on the 11-year and century time scales and indications for its agreement on the day-to-day time scale have been discussed in the literature for 30 years. The present situation is that while a number of authors have considered GCR, supplemented at times by high-energy solar protons, as plausible carriers of the solar variability [Ney, 1959;Markson, 1971Markson, , 1983Dickinson, 1975;Herman and Goldberg, 1978b;Lethbridge, 1981;Robie and Hays, 1982;Ely and Huang, 1987], this view has not yet been convincingly supported by detailed comparisons of time variations. While Lundstedt [1984] has made the claim that the well-known dip in VAI following SB crossings was caused by a decrease in GCR flux, Lastovicka [1987] has argued that this is not so, since the dip precedes the decrease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%