Gold was observed during the mineralogic scan in only one sample (78 YV 216), but was not detected in the spectrographic analysis of that sample. This occurrence is not unusual. In a study of 518 sample sites in the Silver City, New Mexico area, Hassemer and others (1979) reported that of those samples containing gold, gold was detected visually in approximately 10 percent of the samples, but not by spectrographic analysis; while gold was detected by analyses in about 20 percent of the samples, but not visually. The detection of gold visually, but not by analysis, probably results from the malleable nature of the gold which prevents its being mixed throughout the sample during the pulverization step. Thus gold may or may not be present in Use of specific brand names is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. The lower limits on the spectrographic standard for the semi quantitative emission-spectrographic analyses of stream sediments and rocks were as follows: (Ti, Mg, Fe, and Ca are reported in percent; all other elements are reported in ppm) Ti,